A

Have an idea for a story? Mi news@theotherpress.ca

Controversial Trans Mountain pipeline receives reapproval

» Tensions rise between oil and gas industry supporters and environmentalists over federal decision

Tania Arora & Bex Peterson Staff Reporter & Editor-in-Chief

I the face of passionate opposition

as well as passionate support for the divisive project, the federal government has reapproved the construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline.

“Our government has newly approved the Trans Mountain pipeline going forward,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters last month. “The company plans to have shovels in the ground this construction season.”

The pipeline is an expansion of an existing 1,150-km pipeline that passes from Alberta's oilsands through to Burnaby,

BC. Proponents of the pipeline argue that it will create jobs and potentially open Canada’s oil industry to overseas markets in Asia—though some experts are concerned that the latter claim is far more optimistic than factual. Former Liberal environment minister David Anderson has voiced his opposition to the project, warning that there is no evidence that the project will provide an economic stimulus to the country.

“There is no credible evidence to suggest that Asia is likely to be a reliable or significant market for Alberta bitumen,” Anderson wrote in a letter to six members of Trudeau's cabinet in June.

The Trudeau government faced criticism from many corners after purchasing the pipeline project last year for $4.5 billion, with many wondering if it

was a fair or effective use of tax dollars. Environmental and Indigenous rights groups have spearheaded protests against the pipeline, though some First Nations communities remain divided on the topic.

Stephen Buffalo, president and CEO of the Indian Resource Council, has supported the pipeline expansion.

“When the federal government purchased [the pipeline project], it presented an opportunity—a door— for our First Nations to look at possibly owning the pipeline,” said Buffalo according to Global News. He argued that investment in the pipeline could aid in reducing poverty in Indigenous communities.

Chief Kukpi7 Judy Wilson, secretary-treasurer of the BC Union of Indian Chiefs, has been a prominent voice in the fight against the pipeline expansion.

“There are good reasons why Kinder Morgan chose to walk away from this project,’ said Chief Wilson in an open letter to other First Nations leaders this spring, citing “enormous environmental, social, legal, and political ramifications” if the pipeline project were to push forward.

“As long as there is one nation saying no to the pipeline, it cannot be built,” said Chief Wilson.

The Liberals’ announcement last month was met with protests and counter protests in downtown Vancouver

on June 18. According to Global News, approximately 100 proponents of the project gathered in Jack Poole plaza to express their support; later in the day, several hundred protestors came together downtown to voice their opposition and condemnation of the federal government's decision.

“We have to cut emissions in half in 10 years, and planning for money that a future government may or may not spend on the environment when this is over is not

¢ Douglas College cancels anti-SOGI talk ¢ New fast-charging stations in BC ¢ Titan watch: Stage 3, week four

..and more

a ie

Photo of Chief Judy Wilson via Protect the Inlet on Flickr /

enough,” said Peter McCartney with the Wilderness Committee.

Trudeau claimed in his statement to the press that money earned from the pipeline—which Trans Mountain's website predicts will earn $46.7 billion in revenue after two decades of operation—will go towards investing in clean energy projects. The pipeline still requires approval and permits from several organizations and government boards before it can go forward.

A change for Canadian mobile data plans

>» Three Canadian mobile carriers now offering ‘unlimited data’

Photo by Billy Bui

Roshni Riar Staff Writer

O: June 12, Rogers Communications announced that they would be

unveiling “unlimited” data plans for mobile

customers.

Staring at $75 a month, an unlimited plan includes 10 GB of high-speed data. Once 10 high-speed gigabytes on a long-

term evolution (LTE) network—also known

as 4G—is reached, the remaining data for the month will be toggled down to lower speed data, onto a slower 3G network.

Following Rogers’ announcement, both Telus Communications and Bell Canada offered similar plans, all beginning at $75 for 10 GB of high-speed data per month. Additionally, Telus is offering an extra five GB of data for customers who sign up for their offer before July 2.

The announcement comes after talks began surrounding the pending implementation and introduction of a

5G—the fifth generation of broadband cellular network technology—network across Canada.

When Rogers initially unveiled their mobile plan offer, they stated that they would be charging overage fees for any data usage beyond the provided 10 high-speed gigabytes.

After an outcry of public backlash and criticism as many did not believe it should be called an “unlimited” plan, Rogers announced they would be eliminating the previously stated overage fees permanently. Shortly after Rogers’ overage fees were overturned, Bell offered to eliminate overage fees for customers who joined before June 30. Offers vary slightly province to province.

For those who require more high- speed data, all three mobile carriers offer larger plans with either 20 GB or 50 GB of data for an increased monthly price. A 50 GB data plan with unlimited Canada- wide minutes and messaging will cost $125

before tax.

The base prices are “bring your own phone’ plans where there is no fixed contract, but customers must own their phones or buy them outright when signing up fora plan. If a new phone is required, the total monthly charge will include a monthly tab which works to pay off the phone on a two-year plan.

Balraj Singh, an Accounting student at Douglas College, shared their concerns in an interview with the Other Press.

“Even with the elimination of overage fees, [I think] it’s still hard to call this ‘unlimited data,” Singh said.

Singh is not yet satisfied with what is being offered.

Singh said, “I understand there are limitations and [the mobile carriers] need to make money, but when you compare what Canadians have available to them versus what Americans have available [and are] currently paying, it still feels too expensive.”