‘Bwe. Sometimes I remember it one way... The chronicling of one man’s complicated journey through life By Angela Espinoza, Arts Reviewer Barney’s Version is adapted from the 1997 novel of the same name by Canadian writer Mordecai Richler (1931-2001). It tells the story of the titular Barney Panofsky (Paul Giamatti), a Jewish, Montreal-born television producer. Partially taking place in present day, Barney struggles to remember several major events that happened over the past four decades. These include his three marriages: the first to the mentally unstable Clara Charnofsky (Rachelle Lefevre), the second to an egomaniacal and crude nameless “McGill graduate’ (Minnie Driver), and the third to the love of Barney’s life, Miriam Grant (Rosamund Pike). As the years pass by, we watch as each of Barney’s loved ones gradually disappear from his life, and how those remaining attempt to help him cope with his looming Alzheimer’s. The film features an ensemble cast, including Dustin Hoffman as Barney’s father, Izzy, and Scott Speedman as ‘Boogie’, Barney’s best friend. As we examine Barney’s life, dozens of characters continuously come and go, with their importance to Barney varying at different times. Save for several key stars (e.g. Giamatti, Hoffman, Pike, Driver), the majority of the cast is actually Canadian, including director Richard J. Lewis. Barney's Version, while keeping its Montreal setting somewhat low-key, also features cameos by acclaimed Canadian directors David Cronenberg, Atom Egoyan, and Denys Arcand, as well as actor Paul Gross. Its cameos and various audience- directed quips consistently remind its 8 viewers of where they are. However, the inclusion of these amusing moments only make the film’s far more serious tones that much harsher in comparison. ~Barney’s Version is an incredibly fun ride, but when things go wrong, the results are devastating. Barney’s life is not an easy one, but despite his vices and straightforward approach to life, you grow to love him as something of a “frenemy.” There had been various developmental problems that took Barney’s Version roughly twelve years before it could be completed, but the results are near perfect. The cinematography of the film is stunning, but has found itself ironically overshadowed by the slew of flawless actors it embraces. Each actor embodies their role, with even one-off side characters making lasting impressions. This has garnered acting nominations for Pike and Driver at the London Film Critics Circle Awards, as well as winning the Best Actor award for Giamatti at this year’s Golden Globes. As the film covers most of Barney’s life, there was a great attention to detail on the actors’ appearances, gaining an Academy Award nomination for Best Makeup. After premiering at the 67" Venice International Film Festival last year (and earning a nomination for the Golden Lion {Best Picture}), Barney’s Version has been gradually released into theatres, and is currently being screened throughout BC. nace Be mine Blue Valentine It’s blue and gold all at the same time By Jacey Gibb © movie comes along that reminds us how awful loves really is and that we're all going to die alone. My first thoughts when the credits began to roll after Blue Valentine were how the hell do I dissect this smorgasbord of emotions that I’ve just been served? J ust in time for Valentine’s Day, a How do I write good things about a movie ~ that made me feel simply bad? In case you’ ve avoided hearing about the film and all the awards buzz it’s been generating, Blue Valentine is a time period jumping piece tracking the formation and eventual disintegration of a charming young couple, played to perfection by Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams. Think (500) Days of Summer minus the indie quirk plus a kid involved. Yeah. It sucks. Thankfully, the haunting trailer (Gosling’s singing still gives me the | willies) leaves the majority of the plot unrevealed, so I'll try and refrain from too many major spoilers. The important thing to remember is we’re not concerned with where these characters end up, but more so on how they arrive at that fateful destination. Subtle, yet awfully revealing Easter eggs pop up along the way to give insight to the various flaws inflicting each half of the couple. I’m not usually one to comment on and take mental notes about symbolism or hidden meanings in films, but repeatedly this film slapped me in the face like a fish on dry land. The most powerful example would be when the characters decide to spend an evening away together and escape to a themed hotel (bow chicka wow wow). Ignoring the option of the ‘Cupid Room’, Gosling’s character chooses the ‘Future Room’ to be their love bungalow. When they arrive, they are greeted with a cold, foreign environment completely absent of any windows or source of exterior lighting. I guess the comparison to their relationship may not have been as subtle when I think about it now but my realization of it in the theatre sure kicked my emotions in the groin. Much like (500) Days, the majority of the movie is composed of scenes with only the two leads onscreen. This proves an easy feat though, as both actors give performances that are worth every bit of praise they’ve received so far. Gosling’s journey from dorky, sincere Dean into an ambitionless family man infuriates the viewer while Williams’ Cindy plays the part of dependant, not without spine, woman who seems to always have to rely on a man. IVE SAID ENOUGH! I understand the negative reviews that are circulating though. If you know what to expect, that’s probably the best way to prepare. The pacing seems slow too, which I felt was an intentional way to help the audience feel the years slip past. Real life isn’t a laugh buffet oozing with car chases; it’s just real life, and that’s all Blue Valentine is. I won’t say how it ends or what becomes of the seemingly doomed from the opening scene pairing. The story is engaging, the actors are great and, as for the movie itself... Well, let’s Just say it leaves you feeling a little Blue too. Rating: 4/5 OOo