A NOTE FROM THE RETIRING PRESIDENT OF THE DOUGLAS COLLEGE FACULTY ASSOCIATION Now that the first round of negotiations,the one dealing with money matters,is drawing to a close, 5 we must confront matters of a more theoretical nature. Key to those matters is the question of composition of the bargaining unit. That is the question that should,in my opinion,be the key issue in the up-coming Associstion election. That is the issue to which I wish to address myself in a moment. First,do you remember the last special meeting? Ve were given a choice: to buy the union idea or not. It was implied that acceptance of the "not" meant continuance of the status quo. Unfortunately,we were never presented with the third alternative, namely,to have collective bargaining and a legal contract without becoming a certified lahor (iri It appears now thet the third alternative is less than a remote possibility since an application for certification has been sent. But,if the faculty, after a reasoirable time and trial of certification, chooses to decertify,the third alternative could become a reality. But the reality of our existing situation is that we have applied for certification and we likely will become certified as a labor union. The big question, the one that has been troubling many of us iss Should the administrators be part of the bargaining unit? And who are the administrators? The issue | in its unresolved state is of particular concern to the negotiating team. iho does it represent? What does it say in the matter of emoluments? What does it say about election of administrative per~ sonnel? The faculty has been notably silent on these questions and,it seems,the department chair-~ men/directors as a group have been split in their stand. Now is the time to question whether a faculty ember can he both a supervisor and a rank-in- file member? Is that ‘having your cake and eating at. 200°? Maybe it is,but if we were to elect our administr tors,they could be included in the unit and we covid try,tien,having it both ways at once. But I'm afraid it would not achieve very much to go that route. It is for that reason,in part, that I am vroposings tht someone running for office in the elections .ate atunion'position like the one which follows: j H e ; é .