page 8 THE OTHER PRESS Homosexuality: understa A critical lOOk OT heterosexual pre 1 AM, NOT A HOMOSEXUAL. | AM A CONCERNED HETEROSEXUAL WHO .-.FEELS THAT ANYONE WHO PERSECUTES ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL ON THE BASIS OF DIFFERENCES IS IGNORANT AND PREJUDICED. by OMAR SHARIFF ‘Its absurd to belieVe in more than one god, to have many wives or to pray to idols,’’ remarked an_ illustrious student in his opening Sociology 101 ’ class. The student was judging another culture by his own personal standards. In the face of a serious roadblock, the teacher offered the following writing segment to his class: “The Nacirema have an almost pathological horror of and fascination with the mouth, the condition of which is believed to have a supernatural influence on all social relationships. Were it not for the rituals of the mouth, they believe that their teeth would fall out, their gums bleed and their lovers reject them. The daily body “an almost pathological horror and fascination with the mouth.” ritual performed by everyone includes a mouth-rite which strikes the unini- tiated stranger as revolting. The ritual consists of inserting a small bundle of, hog hairs into the mouth along with certain magical powders and then moving the bundle in a highly formal- ized series of gestures. In addition to the private mouth-rite, the people seek out a holy-mouth-man once or twice a year. These practitioners have an impressive set of paraphernalia, consisting of a variety of augers, awls, probes and prods. The use of these objects in the exorcism of the evils of the mouth involves almost unbeliev- able ritual torture of the client.’’ (People, Power & Process, 43) If you have not already guessed, spell Nacirema backwards and read the passage again and you will get some idea of how a stranger might view the concern in North America about oral hygiene and our relation- ship with the dentist and the bath- room. (People, Power & Process, 43) In the same way, individuals have a tendency to ’’react’’ to the act of homosexuality, to condemn rather than to understand and to learn. This type of repressive attitude which permeates society is better known as ‘cultural death’’ - whereby groups of individuals no longer have the ability to learn from one another. From time immemorial, homo- sexuality has been condemned by traditional western values. The most commonly sited authority to justify such measures is the Old Testament: ’’You shall not lie with a man as with “type of repressive attitude... ‘cultural death.” a woman: that is an abomination.’’ (Lev. 18:22-24) “lf a man has intercourse with a man as with a woman, they both commit an abomination. They shall be put to death; their blood shall be on their own heads.’’(Lev. 20:13-14) The Old Testament cites the act of homosexuality as evil and repulsive because it threatens and undermines the fundamental reproductive unit known as the family, and ultimately the continuation of society itself. Yet, such beliefs are not justified by any body of available evidence. Sociologists refer to such an act (homosexuality) as a ‘’victimless crime’’ - one whereby no_one is injured, yet individuals not directly involved disagree with the activity and try to impress their morality upon these individuals. Since homosexuality proposes to be a ’’threat’’ to society, groups within society (such as the church) attempt to control this form of expression to their ideological advant- age. In addition, homosexuality does not prove to be a threat to the existence of the nuclear family. Rather, homosex- uality is a form of biological population control. which is practiced widely throughout the entire animal kingdom. Since mankind is part of the animal kingdom, it would seem unusual to believe that he has a special means of immunity from homosexuality. Yet, in this modern day of reason, homosexuals are routinely persecuted and alienated from the mainstream heterosexual society. “homosexuality is a ‘victimless crime.” In all communication media forms, including: music, literature, tele- Chris Buffett Graphic/ Martlet