opinions // 16 Success 1s a DIY project » Don't rely on others t W: put a lot of pressure on other people—people we don’t even know: artists, athletes, and politicians, to name a few. When they succeed we cheer them on and when they fail we mope by their corner. We pay money to attend their movies, concerts, games, and conventions just so we can be in their presence. We make false idols out of these people and invest a lot of ourselves into their well-being and achievements. But is that healthy? Living vicariously through other people is normal. I do it, you do it, and your mother definitely does it. But how far is too far? I still remember that story about a sports fan who struck his wife after the team lost. Whether the story is true or some exaggeration, the news was appalling; yet not that surprising, since sport fans are notorious for overreacting to something they won't even get recognition for. So why do we invest so much in, say, a team or an athlete? Well, because there is something in our brains that allows us to relate to athletes and other people we get enjoyment from. We feel the feats they perform, like we are performing them ourselves. We feel the jubilance of a goal and the pain of a loss. It’s through this emotional high and low that we end up getting invested. : o be happy : It’s like watching a movie or : reading a book; we feel what the : characters feel. This is totally : healthy, but only if there is a : balance between self and other. For most of us, we aren't : athletes, we aren’t musicians, : and we aren't actors. We need : others to break us out of the : stress of our lives. Our exams, : our job interviews, and our : dates are all ordeals we have : to go through on our own, and : it’s not healthy to just focus on : ourselves, either. It’s important : to achieve our own goals, while : cheering for others. You end up : creating a community within : yourself. You work for you, but : you find inspiration in others, : while never relying on other : people to improve yourself. Would Leonardo DiCaprio : winning an Oscar really make : you happy? Why should it? : Would Team Canada losing the : gold medal upset you? Were : they going to share the goal : medal with you? Should you : have gone on the ice for Sidney : Crosby and scored for him? : Probably not. But you can still be happy, : and you don’t even need Leo or : Sid. You can do it all by yourself. : Create goals that don’t involve : other people, goals that you : can achieve without the help : of anyone else. It could be as : simple as a diet or a physical : challenge, or to reach an : academic or career goal. It’s nice : to see other people succeed, : but remember there are always : people rooting for you, and : they deserve to see you succeed : as well—and you owe them : nothing. al fs Sn fi afi f Ls e F 3 iM j = . | > ae theotherpress.ca By www.thoughtleadershiplab.com Olympic successes belong to all Canadians » Quebec and Canadian accomplishments are synonymous Or: the medals started piling up for Canada in the first week of the Sochi Olympic Winter Games, the “True North” debate on social media shifted from Olympic glitches and repulsive Russian anti-gay laws to something a little more baffling: that of distinguishing between the successes of Olympians from Quebec and those from the rest of Canada. The talk has extended from social media and into the Minews @theotherpress.ca : mainstream media: reporters have noted that if you took : the medals won by Canadian : Olympians in Sochi and divvied : them up between Quebec and : the rest of Canada, Canada : would not be as high in the : medal standings. Some have : also pointed out that Quebec : has earned more medals than : any other province. These aren't even Quebec separatists talking about it, but : Quebec federalists as well. While it’s technically true that our athletes from Quebec : have been doing exceptionally : well at this year’s Winter : Games, those athletes attend : the games as representatives of : Canada. : we were to ask Alex Bilodeau or the Dufour-Lapointe sisters: : who they won medals for, they'd : : say Canada. : while athletic development : is something that Canadian : provinces are responsible : for, and Quebec has a great : program for funding its : athletes, it’s also important to : remember that Quebec has : been the beneficiary of a lot : of federal dollars to support : their development: the : Financial Post reports that the : federal government allocates : $62-million annually to the : Own the Podium program. : In addition, there are the Iam almost certain that if But let’s talk specifics: : Canadian Olympic facilities—in : : Montreal, Vancouver, Whistler, : and Calgary—where many Canadian athletes train for the : Winter Games. This is, by and : large, a team effort; a national : effort. I’m certain the athletes : from Quebec would also say as : much. The fact is, this wouldn’t even exist as a topic for : discussion if the situation were : reversed. If British Columbia, : for example, was cleaning : house in terms of medals, there : wouldn't be an alternative : medal count that excludes : athletes from the Province of : Quebec. It’s okay to be proud of the : accomplishments of Canadian athletes, regardless of where : in the country they’re from. It’s perfectly acceptable to tout : the Quebec athletic program : as being the most generous in : terms of funding. But let’s not : get carried away in this talk : about how Quebec athletes : are somehow more inclined : to Olympic success than : Olympians from other parts of : the country. It only diminishes : the remarkable Olympic : successes of athletes like Dara : Howell (Ontario), Denny : Morrison (British Columbia), : and Patrick Chan (Ontario). : Are we honestly going to : keep talking about this?