Gaza Strip By J. Sinclair On Thursday, January 28, the Society for the Humanities offered a film and discussion on the situa- tion in the refugee camps in the Is- raeli-occupied Gaza Strip. Only half the film was seen, due to a shortage of time; but in that half, the history of the Israeli occupation, which dates from 1948, was evoked through images and interviews. The Palestinian refugee camp dwellers, interviewed in their one room homes, or on the street beside their tents, spoke of violations of in- ternational law. They described the wrecking of houses in retaliation for the activities of one family member, the imposition of curfews, the daily surveillance of I.D. passes and work permits. They spoke with anger and sorrow for relatives and {friends who were incarcerated for resisting the Israeli regime. Footage of bulldozers smashing down houses and widening streets, while children huddled among the family possessions in a heap by the roadside, or under a tent, gave graphic testimony to the Palestinians’ words. Images of A wreckage. dust and depression per- vaded the film. Also shown were clips of inter- views with Israeli officials, who spoke of “peaceful co-existence’, with the Arabs" and repeated the: now familiar line of "necessary, force;" these officials stressed the restraint of the Israeli troops, and lauded the far- sightedness of their own policies. The discussion that followed the film ranged from the historical reasons for the situationa in Gaza. to the international implications of Israel’s actions, and the actions of the Palestinians.. Most people present seemed to favour handing Gaza back to the Palestinians, al- though one person, recently living in Gaza, was angry at the Israeli presence in the Mid-East. He pointed out that the Mid-East na- tions had been forced to deal with European problems. That the Palestinians need to arouse western liberal sympathy. traditionally reserved for the Is- raelis. was a point brought up: another was the strained nature of Palestinian-Arab relations and the political and economic reasons for that strain. It was also pointed out that the Arab states rely on the U.S. oil market, and do not with to alienate the U.S. by coming down too hard on the Israelis. What seemed to be the general agreement was the fact that Israel acts in the best interests of the U.S. It was pointed out that 60% of U.S. foreign aid goes to Israel - that is, $5.000 per year for every Israeli. This being the case, the reasons for the continued occupation of Pales- tinian land can be looked for a lot closer to hame than Gaza. ee PN N Buckle Up BC/ Naceieleaichaisiannana™ Tor THE BOMBINGS IN EL yy SALVADOR Council's Demands Letter to Bill Day Re: Student Rally The students’ understanding of your committments are as follows: 1. There will be re-considerations by the negotiating team rearding the decision not to allow a student ob- server at negotiations. 2. You are willing to speak at an open forum of students, on the is- sues of the negotiations. 3. “Depending on what the funds are", you are willing to _ assist us in pressuring the Government for more educational _ funding. 4. With data. you will speak to the Senate to discuss financial priorities at the College. Your patience and genuine attempt to answer questions was much ap- preciated. Thank you for your co-operation. Anena Johnston Student Council President Student concerns Mr. Day, The dispute between faculty and the College has us worried. We are concerned that the dispute may jeop- ardize our chances of finishing the semester with good grades. As a group we have boycotted class today as a means of bringing to your attention the seriousness of our con- cerns. Our message to you is this: We understand that the College demands to change hiring procedures is the main item in the dispute between the College and the teachers. Since we believe Douglas College has excellent | teachers, current hiring methods for teachers at Douglas College can’t be that bad. To settle this dispute you should drop your demands. Other classes and groups of stu- dents plan to take similar action to convince you that this dispute must be settled quickly. Class Number: Math 421 Date: Feb 23/88 Admin Responds To: Anena Johnston, President. DCSS Re: DKFA and college negotia- tions . I am writing in response to your memorandum to Bill Day dated February 19, 1988, with particular reference to item |--the question of — a student observer at negotiations. The matter has been reviewed by the College negotiating team. and by the Douglas College Board. Both the negotiating team and the Board have reaffirmed their posi- tion, as communicated to you in January. Open Letter This is areminder to Mr. William Day of his speech on page one of the 1987-88 Douglas College Calendar: In your speech to DC students you stated that after a complete major self-study and visit by a crew team of reps of other post secondary institutions in B.C. and Alberta, Douglas College is especially noted for the high esteem in which it is held by the public at large in its region and by its own students. This kind of reputation is not built over- night. It is the product of years of consistent, high quality work on the part of your instructor who help you learn, and our staff, who provide you with services. You can each be con- fident that Douglas will continue to live up to its reputation.” Dear Mr. Day: Are you willing to contradict your own speech by not willing to negotiate some sort of agreement with faculty? While it is viewed as inap- propriate to have a Student Society observer at negotiations with the- DKFA, the College is prepared to provide to the Student Society a copy of documents articulating the College's positions at the bargain- ing table, once they have been for- mally tabled with the DKFA. The negotiating team would, as well, be prepared to meet with the Student Society Executive to answer questions relevant to any proposal laid before the DKFA. Ross Cameron, Director, Personnel and Labour Relations To Bill Day You stated to us "you are a stu- dent at an excellent school”. I feel we all are at an excellent college and we would like our education to con- tinue to reflect that belief. Are you willing to destroy and take apart what Douglas College members and students have worked to hard to achieve? Over the years. Rome wasn’t built in a day, but it was destroyed overnight. We don’t want to see that happen to Douglas College. We want good quality education. We. the students, ask you to be humane and to try to negotiate an agreement with faculty. After all, we- the students are paying cash forthe. _ survival of the: college. our educa- tion, administrative staff and its ~ faculty too. Yours truly L.C. Di Marco