VOLUME X, NUMBER 28 #& INNOVATION A BSTRA CTS What the Fox Needs to Know The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing. Archilochus High Fashion CBL (competency based learning) is back in town. Resplendent in color-coordinated garb, CBL is all order and system, exuding rules and structures and steps. CBL provides education's current high fashion look. Traditional role-model instruction, by contrast, is little more than rumpled corduroy. The appeal to our beleaguered colleges and institutes is obvious: CBL promises a stylish science of instruction to replace an outmoded art. The CBL process starts with getting together a group of practitioners, what one authority calls the lunch bucket brigade. They spend a predetermined time {which sounds a lot like traditional instruction), usually two or three days, with a facilitator and break down the job into 100, or 150, or 287 specific tasks. These can range from “communicate with peers” to “assemble hij;h pressure air hose.” The result is the familiar DACUM (Develop a Curriculum) chart, which contains in detail everything which might appear on a job description except “other tasks as assigned.” A little problem here, because these “other tasks” often consti- tule the major part of many jobs. After cach task has been identified, it is put into a competency format, which states a pre-specified level of performance which must be achieved under pre- specified conditions. Based on these statements, mod- ules are developed—with pre-test, objectives, learning materials, learning activities, and post-test. CBL is very imposing, so precise and tidy, so tangible and well-engineered. But does it work? Is CBL compe- tent, or is it just the latest look? A Plan Too Perfect Probably the primary defect of CBL is what its advocates believe to be its biggest strength: its mecha- nistic precision. The development process wrings out everything we can discover about a job and transforms these things, and only these, into competencies. Thus, A Elo ein ITY OF TEXAS AT students learn what they need to learn and no more. Clean, clear, efficient. The problem is that many jobs do not parse very easily. A few jobs, such as typist or elevator operator, can be divided into specific skills without difficulty. A group of journeymen hedgehogs, for example, could probably develop a DACUM which would be sufficient to prepare an apprentice for every conceivable hedge- hogian task. However, even occupations like caretaker contain many qualities that fall between the cracks on the DACUM. When the focus is entirely on tasks that appear on the chart, some of the most critical qualities may be inadvertently overlooked. Every rabbit knows that the fox, one of nature’s prime entreprencurs, is somehow more devious than his DACUM would suggest. The rabbit wishes it were otherwise. In the analysis of what went wrong in the Three Mile Island nuclear accident in 1979, the Kemmeny Commis- sion concluded that human error on the part of the technicians caused the failure. The technicians re- sponded by saying that they had not been trained for the situation which they had to confront. The Commis- sion looked at the training program and discovered that the technicians had learned how to operate the reactor without any understanding of why things happened. They had been well trained to push the right buttons at the right time, but they were incapable of dealing with the unfamiliar. [This kind of training brings to mind the explanation made by a car manufacturer when criticized about the quality of the brakes on his vehicles. The brakes, a spokesman responded, are adequate in all normal circumstances. This was hardly reassuring, as the times you need really good brakes are in abnormal circum- stances. | In the process of getting all the tasks for a nuclear technician written down on paper, the connections and the meaning and the why must have gotten lost. Indeed, it is probably impossible to write down all the subtleties of most jobs. It is well known that novices are better able to describe how they do their jobs than are the experts. Expertise is increasingly understood to be basically intuitive and not easily dredged up to the conscious level. Furthermore, while novices tend to approach the same task in the same way, cach expert é mn THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STAFF AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (NISOD) A Community College Leadership Program, The University of Texas at Austin EDB 348, Austin, Texas 78712