Success for the Clan, but don’t expect Douglas to follow By Garth McLennan, Sports Editor history in July when they became the first school outside of the United States to gain acceptance into the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Now, SFU was accepted as a second division school into the Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC), so don’t have any visions of Final Four or Bowl game glory just yet. Still though, just being allowed into the best university/college loop in the world at any level is a major achievement. After a lengthy two-year process, SFU S imon Fraser University (SFU) made and all 19 of their sports teams were granted admission into the NCAA beginning in 2011-2012. They’ll compete regularly against various squads from nine other GNAC schools: Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Fairbanks, Central Washington, Montana State Billings, Northwest Nazarene, Saint Martin’s, Seattle Pacific, Western Oregon and Western Washington. There are also a few schools that compete in the GNAC for football only. It’s still unclear as to where all the dominoes will fall, but there is a very real possibility that SFU may be able to field a hockey team in division 1. The NCAA regulations permit a certain number of division 1 sports to be played by division 2 schools, and hockey would be SFU’s best bet in that regard. It would be difficult for them to compete in any other sport at that high of a level. As for any other Canadian institutions, don’t bank on NCAA membership for them any time soon. The NCAA will look at the SFU experiment extremely closely before even considering any other schools north of the 49", and unfortunately, Douglas College isn’t even on the radar of making the short list of schools that would be considered. Currently, Douglas College plays out of the Northwest Athletic Association of Community Colleges. Should golf be an Olympic sport? Absolutely By Garth McLennan, Sports Editor he debate about which sports should be Olympic events and which shouldn’t is pretty much timeless, and it’s sure to be stirred again with golf looking very much like the newest sport to be included in the 2016 Summer Games. That’s because the International Olympic Committee (IOC) executive board has recently returned a decision recommending the inclusion of golf and rugby sevens. In order to have golf rubberstamped as an official Olympic event, the full 106 strong IOC will vote on the matter in October. What I can’t understand is why people are upset about this. Golf is a game that requires a tremendous amount of skill and is perfectly suited to the two-week format of the Olympics. The standard, medal-play professional golf tournament is contested over four days, with a cut of the bottom tier players coming after the second day. That would fit in nicely, considering how highly compact almost everything else is at the Olympics. Golf is also an extremely international sport. I mean, almost every country out there plays golf. It isn’t like other sports currently on the Olympic roster which are almost always dominated by the United States or China. All you have to do for proof of that is take a quick look at the PGA Tour World Rankings. Sure, Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson, both Americans, top the list but after that it’s fairly open. Paul Casey, ranked third, is British. Sergio Garica, at sixth, is Spanish, while seventh ranked Henrik Stenson hails from Sweden. Geoff Ogilvy, at eighth, is Australian while Padraig Harrington rounds out the top ten from Ireland. Then you have former world number one Vijay Singh, who’s from Fiji or Retief Goosen from South Africa. Now, some would say that the allure of an Olympic gold medal wouldn’t mean as much as a victory in a Major for most golfers. Some ask, would Sergio Garcia, who has never won a major, rather win a gold medal or the British Open? There is some truth to that, but I don’t think it would be a determining factor. After all, tennis and basketball are both popular Olympic events, and both of those have prizes outside the Games that outstrip the gold medal. With the already highly diluted pool of Olympic events, one could also argue that the IOC should be much more selective in what sports are granted admission from now on. However, I maintain that if pistol shooting and synchronized diving are allowed in, then golf should be as well. It may not have the popularity of soccer or baseball, but people still care about golf. Imagine how cool a sight it would be to have Tiger Woods standing on top of the podium as the first ever golf gold medal winner. There really isn’t any logical reason why golf shouldn’t be included. It’s popular, it’s easy to identify with, it’s international, it’s got a ready-made and easy to understand format, it has a number of household names and no shortage of breathtakingly beautiful venues from which to choose. Here’s hoping the IOC makes the right move and inducts a truly magnificent sport into its ranks. Vick is a disgrace, not a case of redemption By Garth McLennan, Sports Editor ith the announcement of Michael Vick’s signing with the Philadelphia Eagles, the sports talk phone lines have been packed with people proclaiming that this is a good thing for football and for Vick. That it’s a good example of young man who has paid his debt to society and is deserving of a second change. . Forgive me if I don’t share the same sentiment. The fact is that Michael Vick is a disgusting, unconscionable person. We’re talking about.a guy who repeatedly committed a nauseatingly revolting felony for seven years. For seven years! I mean, this is a person (and I use that term very loosely) that slaughtered innocent dogs for fun, in the most cruel and horrendous ways imaginable. He pitted half-starved dogs against each other in death matches and then electrocuted, drowned or hung the losers. This wasn’t a one-time occurrence. It wasn’t a stupid mistake that anyone could make. This was a well-funded operation that ran for almost a decade. Then, when it was finally discovered by the authorities, Vick came out and publicly lied to the fans, the Atlanta Falcons and the NFL. And the only reason that Vick is now coming out and attempting to gain forgiveness for his crimes is because all of his scumbag friends ratted him out as the ringleader! If they’d refused to flip on him, do you think for a second that Vick would still be _ offering to help animal rights groups? Now, it is true that Vick has lost a lot. He served almost two years in prison and lost tens of millions of dollars in salary and endorsement deals. He went from being the highest-paid player in the NFL to working construction part time as a condition of his release for ten bucks an hour. He lost two years of the prime of his career and lost the respect and admiration of the entire sporting world. He even filed for bankruptcy protection. All of this is true, and no one can deny that it is a momentous loss for any person. But the fact is Vick brought this on himself. He wasn’t a victim of circumstance. Nobody forced him into it. He had plenty of time to recognize what he was into and to stop if he wanted to. He didn’t. He only stopped because he got caught. He had seven years to think about what he was doing. Every day for seven years he got up in the morning with the full knowledge of what was happening on that property of his in Virginia. And it’s not like Vick was a saint besides the dog fighting. I mean, we’re also talking about a monumentally stupid individual. After all, not many are photographed getting baked outside the courthouse right before sentencing. Also, not many attempt to smuggle pot onto a team plane. Or lend a truck to two buddies in Virginia who got arrested for pot distribution. Or flip off the fans in New Orleans for booing him. Or get sued for sexual assault. Or, and this seems pretty basic, not risk everything, a mammoth contract, major sponsorships with Nike, Coca-Cola and more, on Bad Newz Kennels. Talk about a moron. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell should never have let Michael Vick back into the league. This is a man who is a repeat, chronic offender who clearly has displayed the type of personality unfit for professional sports, if not society as a whole. Vick is a disgrace, and I don’t know how anyone could live with themselves if they bought his jersey or any of his merchandise. Goodell had the opportunity to make a strong statement about the kind of scum that should not be tolerated, but he didn’t. It’s a shame. 19