12 “After prolonged research on myself, I brought out the fundamental duplicity of the human being. Then I realized ... that modesty helped me to shine, humility to conquer, and virtue to oppress.” —Albert Camus, “The Fall” By Lindsay Jolivet, The Silhouette (McMaster) HAMILTON (CUP)—Camus’ words revealed the complexity of honesty and dishonesty, virtue and vice. Through his observation that moral behaviour can cause damage, he implied the potential of immoral behaviour to prevent that damage. I’m talking about lying, that baffling concept that has the power to destroy relationships and restore egos. + Camus’ quote above, among others, introduces Sissela Bok’s Lying: Moral Choice in Public Life. Bok’s text shows us that dishonesty can become a complex moral issue. For example, the first lines of the book ask, “Should physicians lie to dying patients so as to delay the fear and anxiety which the truth might bring them? Should professors exaggerate the excellence of their students on recommendations in order to give them a better chance in a tight job market? Should parents conceal from children the fact that they were adopted?” These are difficult questions that reveal the potential of lies to bring comfort, confidence and closeness, however false they may be. The familiar proverb “honesty is the best policy” may not be as simple as it seemed when we were told to believe it as children. Research has shown that most people lie; however, Dr. Violetta Igneski, a professor of ethics in communication at McMaster University, is not concermed with empirical research “Tn my class, I aim to teach students ways of reasoning through difficult situations and ways of weighing various reasons and ordering different beliefs and values they hold, rather than teaching them facts about lying,” she said. Igneski is interested in moments when it might be good or right to lie, and if doing so is ever “right.” Motivation informs whether a lie is justifiable. We are all familiar with little white lies that protect others’ self-esteem. Altruistic lies protect those being lied to from painful or difficult truths. Igneski listed questions individuals can ask to determine whether lies are justifiable. “Would it really protect the individual being lied to? Would it really bring about the best consequences? Are they really doing it for altruistic reasons, or is there an underlying personal benefit?” Convincing yourself that your motives for lying are selfless when they