E s oe The following memo has recently been sent to all directors in the college. It is reproduced here for your information, and to indicate the need for co-operation amongst all faculty to ensure. responsible disbursement of funds: TO: All Directors DATE: November 14, 1974 FROM: Educational Leave Sub-committee RE: Educational. Leave This letter is Intended to acquaint you with some of the concerns presently felt by the Educational Leave Committee. These concerns have, in general, one thing in common, and that is finance. In the first place, the Committee realizes that the present allocation of money, 1% of the instructional budget, is not adequate for the number of deserving applications that are being rec- elved at this point. As times: goes on, the situations will become a great deal more acute, unless greater co-operation is given by faculty members throughout the college. It is hoped that the allocations of monies will increase In the foreseeable future, but even then the need for responsible disbursement will be in no way diminished, owing to the anticipated growth In the number of applications. With this thought in mind, the Committee wishes to request your continued co-operation in investigating, with the help of department members, the most economical way of temporarily replacing any colleague applying for educational leave of an appropriate nature. The Committee feels that the department admin- istrator who gives approval to a leave application should take into consideration the drain a full-time replacement makes upon the available funds. With broader discussions in your department involving, especially, all affected faculty, it Is hoped that adjustments might be possible that would facilitate leave for your immediate colleague and, also, for a number of deserving applicants in other departments. It is common knowledge that, heretofore, discussion of leave plans has not always occurred in department meetings and, as a result, the cost of replacement has not been looked at realistically. Besides the financial aspects there have been, in some Instances,disryptive factors affecting depart- mental organization. This will become a much more serious problem soon when the matter of the two kinds of educational leave will arise. The time is fast approaching when eligible faculty members will be applying for double semester leave, and the responsibility for departmental coordination will then become a great deal more necessary. The Educational Leave Committee should not have to weigh the implications of the Sa leave requests !n a given department, since any decisions regarding replacement should be made by the affected faculty members. Our Committee should be concerned, rather, with those matters relating to the priority of the applications in terms of benefit to the college as a whole. With the knowledge that each application, and what it entalls, has been thoroughly examined and approved by the applicant's colleagues, the matter of ranking the applications becomes somewhat more stralght- 'forward for the Committee. fs : ' 4 in the future, members of the Educational Leave Committee will be réquésting time at department meetings to discuss issues related to educational leave. Thank you for. your co-operation. 5 coe ae Marilyn Smith, Chairman. P.S. A reminder - deadline for application for educational leave, Fall 1975, is February 1, 1975.