te Oey Beg? N N N what? A collect cate from ; Yo |'wou't excl te charges damn jt/ hello...Pierre? by Dave Christan Now that you’ ve read all of this stuff about how your government isn’t doing any- thing to stop nuclear wea- NDP MP Pauline Jewwitt, they hate being told that. Al- so, because of the advanced state of Canada’s telecom- munications system (if not pons testing in Canada, and youve though seriously about the chances of actually sur- viving a nuclear exchange the postal system), it is rel- atively inexpensive to phone Trudeau or Mceachen in their parlimentary offices. (remember, with Comox Air Force Base only just across the Georgia Strait and the Canadian Forces Base in Chilliwack, the odds are _ pretty good that Vancouver d the Lower Mainland will phone numbers - are: cease to exist in the event of Prime Minister a war), the question upper- . For the best rates, call bet- answering machines saying, most on your er should Trudeau: be: ‘‘What can I do about © it?’’ Exactly the Question I 112(613)992-4211; wanted to hear! Are you aware that the CNCP rate for sending a short telegram to Ottawa is only $2.65? Do it! Send one to Trudeau or Mceachen (even both) telling them how they’re actions are fuelling the Arms Race. According to External Affairs Minister Mceachen: 112(613)995-1851. ween 6 p.m. and 8 a.m. and leave a message on their again, that their actions are fuelling the Arms Race.The Do you only want us for our money? ““Graduating students who started making loans three or four years ago will be locked into repaying those loans at 15 7/8 percent...a rate which does not reflect the rec- ent drop in interest rates,’’ said David Orlikow, Winnipeg North M.P. Students are being burned. The Canada Student Loan Program was a well con- ceived plan. Students were given a chance at. post- secondary education that they might not otherwise have had due to financial difficulties. Loans were reasonably easy to acquire. No interest was charged for six months after graduation, and a fresh graduate had an excellent chance of starting loan pay- ments within six months. There is no question that there are scores of college and university grads who cannot find work, and after six months find themselves unemployed and in debt. Students who do manage to make payments will be feeding the swine-like hunger of the banks through in- flated interest rates. This situation must be put to an end. Interest rates must be fixed below prime, and the interest-free period of grace should extend until the student has found a job. * The Canada Student Loan Program has. got to be re- stored to a position where it offers a great help to stu- dents, not a potential hinderance. THE OTHER PRESS talk-action=zero by Pat Worthington Recently, there has been a lot of concern that the Aca- demic program at Douglas College will be drastically cut or entirely eliminated. . President Bill Day says, “It is extremely unlikely that the academic program will be eliminated.’’ But is this the truth? The fact is that many course sections disappeared this year, and many students weren’t able to get the courses they wanted. Academic programs are affected by several factors, two of which seem very im- portant. One is available funds, and the other is pro- vincial and national prior- ities. In the past, budget cuts have resulted in the cancel- lation of summer school, the closure of the Winslow and Langley Campuses and the end of Basic Adult Education at Douglas College. Obviously budget cuts are a big factor in course plan- ning at this college. Mike MacNeill, a Canadian Feder- ation of Students field work- er reports that ‘‘There may be no increase in the educa- tion funds next year.’’ This can only mean less academic courses in the future. In addition, the National Training Act, which concen- trates on vocational training, may become one of the col- lege’s priorities by Septem- ber; 1984. When all this information is examined, is the elimina- tion of the academic program extremely unlikely as Day states? Or is he just handing stu- dents some _ prefabricated yarns that do not significant- ly reflect his actions? Actions speak louder than words, Bill. : The Other Press seems to lhave a confused attitude to- wards tobacco. The Feb. 2 issue included an article warning of the dan- gers of cigarettes. 1 assume that the paper printed it to discourage smoking. However, two weeks ear- lier, the Other Press ran an ad for cigarettes. Tobacco, your Feb. 2 feature said, ‘‘claims the lives of approx- imately 100,000. ee annually from smoking and ~ THE OTHER PRESS IS BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH smoke-related fatalities.’’ The cigarette company pla- ced the ad in the paper be- cause the cost will probably be justified by an increase in sales. In other words, the company used the paper as a tool to sell its’ dangerous product. The Other Press, therefore, is potentially con- tributing to lung cancer and other nasty diseases among the college population. I find. this an inappropriate role for a student newspaper. This is also a chance for the Other Press to demon-. strate its’ independence of thought from other student newspapers. (They usually boycott ads because they don’t like the company or the ad, not because they don’t like the product.) I ask the Other Press to explain its’ advertising pol- icy. I also hope the paper | seriously considers pete ads Chris Page to run any further cigarette [ If I stood on one foot for 9 hours , it would make no difference on the rice crops in Malaysia... ’ s