Never Let Another Rwanda Happen Again Paul Martin fhade his first speech as Prime Minister to the United Nations last Wednesday, outlining his vision for a more dynamic world governing body. In the speech, PM-Squared addressed the need for quicker response capabilities where there is the suspicion of human rights atroci- ties occurring, such as in the Darfur region of Sudan where tens of thou- sands of Sudanese have already perished in the government-sanc- tioned civil war. “Our common humanity should be a powerful enough argument, and yet that is precisely what is missing,” Martin told a largely unenthusiastic crowd. However, he also offered $20 million to the African Union (AU)—a full third of the $60 million the AU requested in order to equip and deploy 3,000 troops to the region. The PM’s proposal is based on the “Responsibility to Protect” plan that was drafted after the UN watched 800,000 Rwandans die in the 1994 genocide. So this plan is really gaining momentum. Part of the problem with any solu- tion to the inhumane treatment of some of the world’s citizens is the lin- guistics and “legal” nature of proceedings. Many spots on interna- tional committees are held by African dictatorships who believe in self- preservation almost as staunchly as SEReMUEF 29/2000 News Wears Short Shorts Brandon Ferguson, News Editor our Republican friends down south. Gaining unanimity on votes of action is nearly impossible—both Russia and China, who are veto nations on the Security Council, have internal con- flicts that they would prefer to deal with themselves and without the threat of international interference. Currently, the UN is debating as to whether the situation in Sudan is tech- nically genocide, and _ therefore, whether it is “legal” to send in peace- keepers. Despite the dreariness that empty rhetoric breeds—take the fake news section, for example—it is still impor- tant that these messages be delivered. Way to go Paul. We'll be the first in line to say “and let’s never let another Sudan happen again.” Cat Stevens: Secret Agent Man International man of folksy music, Cat Stevens, was removed from his London-to-Washington flight last Tuesday after his name showed up on a “no-fly” list—a fact that was observed mid-flight. Stevens was held for questioning and returned to London by Wednesday, without an explanation for his special status. But, my friends, the question here is not one of overzealous harassment or the misguided efforts of a xeno- phobic nation who have this week aimed their wrath at a folk hero from the 60s and 70s who is responsible for such feel good hits as “Wild World” and “Peace Train.” No sir. The ques- tion is: who és Cat Stevens really? After folk became obsolete and unimportant, Stevens saw the next wave of popular radical expressionism and caught it—Islam. He took on the name Yusuf Islam, demonstrating the simplistic creativity that propelled him to the height of folk stardom. “Ooh baby baby, it’s a wild world,’ doesn’t just rhyme with “Pll always remember you like a child, girl” all by itself, you know. Well, I guess it does—but do you think “Cat” is even his real name? Yusuf Islam was born Steven Dimetti Georgiou before he was Cat Stevens. That’s like Muslim, Commie, and Dr. rk Seuss all in one. What is he hiding? It may be his work with Small Kindness, a humanitarian relief organization that is accredited by, or in cahoots with, the United Nations. It may be his donation of all the pro- ceeds from his 2001-released box set to the September 11 Fund. Or maybe Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge just felt like he was being fol- lowed by a moonshadow. Either way, agent Cat has been sent back to England. Now if we could only catch Raffi and crush his baby beluga jihad.... secret Stevens You Eediots In a report released last Friday, the RCMP has admitted failures in its handling of the Maher Arar case. Arar, a Canadian citizen, gained national media attention when he was deported by the US and held in Syria for over a year, receiving neither a continental breakfast nor protection from international treaties banning the use of torture. The report cites the Mounties’ inability to deal effectively with the heightened demand for information in the post 9-11 orgy of suspicion a failing that likely lead to the hasty divulging of Arar’s file. Information was given without restrictions as to what could be done with it or how it could be used; there is speculation that Canadian intelligence may have been handed over to Syria by the US with Arar. The RCMP did everything but hook the electrodes to the Canuck’s nads. As badly handled as Arat’s case was by the Kilted Yaksmen (Ren and Stimpy reference—dig deep kids), US authorities defied American law when they deported Arar to a country that is known to use torture—a violation of the FARRA Act of 1998 that adopted the recommendations of an interna- tional convention that prohibits such transfers. The Yanks countered that they had diplomatic assurances from Syria that no torture would be involved. Good to see relations have normalized between the US and Syria. A tersely worded letter sent by the Human Rights Advocates organiza- tion to the US Department of Homeland Security regarding the Arar case, and on behalf of the many peo- ple who eat different food and have funny names that are being detained indeterminately, reminded the depart- ment that “the legal obligation not to send people back to torture is absolute.” And that is our big reward, for being the-uh-uh Roy-oy-al Canadian, Kilted, Yaksmen. DUNEPPPeSS | 7