aracter development | - Life & Style Editor arachnophobic but they never encounter a spider, how does that flaw effect the plot in any way? How does that make your character less perfect? You also want to be able to spot stereotypical or superfluous character faults. Examples of these include female characters thinking they’re too fat, or male characters with devil-may-care attitudes. Overcoming these particular faults has been done so many times that it is no longer a valid plot progression—it is an after-school special. However, using these attributes and combining them with other faults goes a long way to making your character believable. No one person has only one bad habit— so no character should either. Also be wary of creating exterior solutions to internal problems. Using a romantic relationship to solve someone's self-esteem issues doesn’t work in real-life, so it shouldn’t work in written form either. It is important to note that as a writer, or a reader, not all characters have to be likeable. One common myth floating around the literary world is that if you don’t like your character, no one else will. This is false—everyone loves a villain. Characters created independent of an author attempting to make them likable are some of the most dynamic. Some of my favourite examples are the Ripley series by Patricia Highsmith, or the original Millennium trilogy by Stieg Larsson. There is some attempt to make both Tom Ripley and Lisbeth Salander—the main protagonists of the above series, respectively—sympathetic, but they aren‘t people you’d want to be BFFs with. Faults are a tricky thing to get a handle on, so if you're a writer, start with what you know. Use your own faults. Your personal experience can go a long way in making your character's voice authentic and therefore believable. Authentic voice and internal monologue are among my 4 J J J J rl J J J J J ra I J J J J ik i I current struggles. It is important to make a character whose perspective you can inhabit, but also to make sure they’re not just you in written form— unless that’s the goal. For me, designing a character who | see as different from myself is what | want. Certain aspects of personality can be self-reflective, but ultimately, | want my characters to be distinct. That becomes difficult when you may be unfamiliar with the narrative precedent your characters will set. In an internal monologue, or in first-person perspective, the narrative needs to change to reflect the character's voice. For example, it seems as though writers often struggle to write characters of different genders from themselves. This has nothing to do with biology and everything to do with how gender norms are socialized. A pertect example is Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood. The main character Snowman is completely disinterested in his own life, and he seems to be only motivated by his own sexuality and guilt over not being strong enough. This is a very stereotypically “male” point-of-view—what a woman might assume a male internal monologue is like. This deficiency can be rectified, however. Reading up and educating yourself on how different people speak and describe things can give you a better grasp on how a similar character may sound internally. Keep in mind, this internal voice shouldn't erase or overshadow the story the author wants to tell. It should only accent it. Closing out, | want to encourage everyone to take the time to either create or examine a character critically. Being aware of how the characters are written is often the first step in determining if you'll enjoy the narrative or not. As | said before, if there's something wrong with the characters, then there will always be something off-putting about the plot.