Hoffa's Body Found (Its Head): College and Union Reach Tentative Agreement Brandon Ferguson, News Editor ao tentative settlement at three of the six striking facilities, including Douglas College. Terms of the deal were not announced, pending a vote by the union workers. However, as of last Friday, rotating job action appeared to be at an end for Douglas College, BCIT, and the Okanagan University College. “This is good news for the students at those three institutions,’ said BCGEU President, George Heyman, who added...wait for it...“We’ve said all along that we’ve wanted to minimize the impact on students during this dispute.” he BCGEU announced last Friday that they had reached a Oh _ yeah George! For students...that was pimp. “No details will be available publicly until our members at each college have had an opportunity to review and vote on the tentative agreement,” said Heyman. Still stuck in the fluctuating joy of hav- ing two sides fighting for you, are the students Northern the from Kwantlen, Lights, and Northwest colleges. “We're hopeful that a settlement can be reached at the three other institutions, and we'll work hard to achieve this,” said Heyman. Of course you are, George. Just as soon as you take care of that ironic little strike going on inside your own offices. I kid you not—this strike has been so ridiculous that even the office workers at BCGEU headquarters went on strike dur- ing this whole debacle. I haven’t seen this many frivolous strikes since Roger Clemens’ last last-game of his career. It is believed that the union side—the BCGEU support workers—was looking for a four-year agreement with a 7-percent cost-of-living and increase, along with increased access to benefits. It is believed that the BC Liberal government was looking to breed some inflationary wage kind of super-monkey race that would work for orange peels and end the need BC Electoral Reform Goes to Referendum in May Single transferable vote system would empower voters, supporters say Andi Bergen, The Martlet (University of Victoria) VICTORIA (CUP)—British Columbia’s Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform says the new electoral system it is propos- ing will improve the of democracy in the province. “Election results will be fairer, reflect- ing a balance between votes and seats. Voters will have more choice and candi- dates will work harder to earn their support,” says the final report of the Citizens’ Assembly, “Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia.” After deliberating for 11 months, the group—made up of 160 randomly select- ed BC residents—has recommended a single transferable vote system. During the provincial election in May, BC voters practice March 2/2005 will decide whether or not to adopt the new system. If implemented, single transferable voting will change the way residents are rep- resented. There will be a clear balance between the popular vote and the seats a party gets in govern- ment. That means if 60 percent of the population vote for the Liberal party, then roughly 60 percent of the seats will go to the Liberals, a significant change from the cur- rent system where the Liberals control over 90 percent of the seats with less than 60 percent of the total votes. The disproportionately high number of white, middle-class men in the legisla- ture will likely be adjusted as well. “There will also be more pressure on parties to have balance in nominations in terms of gender and in terms of visible minorities,” said Norman Ruff, an associ- ate professor of political science at the University of Victoria. Smaller parties will also be able to get seats. “More people will vote for them as a first preference. You won’t have that kind of strategic voting pressure that you have now,” said Ruff. Another change will be the size of constituencies. Each constituency will elect two to seven representatives, but their size will increase so the current number of 79 representatives will not change. Without having multiple-member rid- ings, it would not be possible to achieve proportionality in each riding, said James Lawson, an assistant professor of politi- cal science at the university. But it is not all about the parties and members of the legislative assembly. The electoral reform is designed to benefit voters. “If you really want to empower indi- vidual voters, this is the best system,” said Ruff. This is especially true for supporters of relatively small parties who currently have no representation in government. Through this, proponents say, govern- ments will be more accountable and will be forced to accept compromises, as they will have to consider the policy positions of several other patties. The new system will also change the way ballots are cast. In a single transfer- able vote system, voters rank candidates according to preference. “STV allows each and every voter the chance to say not only which candidate is their favourite, but also to rank a number of less favourite candidates,’ said Lawson. “In other words, who you could live with and not just who you desperate- ly want to represent you.” Ruff points out candidates will be “a lot nicer to each other” because they are trying to pick up the voters’ second and third preferences. for any unions. The agreement should fall somewhere in the middle, hopefully more to the side of the union’s wants. Deputy Minister of Labour, Rick Connolly, deserves some credit for batting clean up and knocking two major strikes right out of the park—he’s been at the fact-finding helm for both this resolve and the BC Place strike. Though this set- tlement is only half done, it’s certainly a bright spot. Talks continued through last weekend, with no job action planned for this week. As a result, counting the votes will become more complex. Candidates will have to obtain a certain number of votes to get elected. If no candidate reaches this quota after the first count, then the candidate with the least votes gets elimi- nated. People who voted for the eliminated candidate will then have their vote transferred to their next preference. In the case a candidate exceeds the quota, votes ate then redistributed to the other candidates according to the next prefer- ence. By redistributing votes according to preference, the system strives to ensure no vote will be “wasted.” After dropping several candidates and relocating votes from one candidate to the other, the victorious candidates are those most accepted by voters in the con- stituency. In countries that use such systems, “people have a sense that their vote counts, their choice really counts, that their vote won’t be wasted, and that increases the probability of a higher turnout,” said Ruff. In order for the new system to be adopted, at least 60 percent of the voters in BC need to vote in favour of it, as well as a simple majority in 60 percent of the ridings. Any Canadian citizen over the age of 18 who has been living in BC for at least six months can vote in both the ref- erendum and the election. The Citizens’ Assembly has also rec- ommended, if electoral reform is accepted, the effectiveness of the system be reviewed after three elections with the involvement of ordinary citizens. www.theotherpress.ca 5