/, ourselves table that it will also become % experienced by amputees—or, at least extending it as far y our anatomy. This is true as our always-within-reach cell phones. 2ek out magnetic implants, It presents some interesting questions about the akers, or have their bodies separation of self and technology. Whether we've always borgian simulation. It is also had a propensity for appropriating externalities as not ve level, as reports show that only our own but ourselves, or if this has just developed mate objects as being part as a result of our growing dependence on innovative yhantom limb” syndrome technologies. Whether our gradual progression to a cyborgian state is good, bad, or a neutral fact of humanity’s development. What the implications could be for generations that have no memory of an existence sans iPhones, Internet, and Google Glass. And how our perceptions will change as we see a world passing in the periphery, eyes locked on a glossy smartphone. wg metal with flesh are. Body her they’re the aesthetic hnologies, or the futuristic ager). novement. Simply put, es biohacking as the practice m of any sort of self- er thought, meditation, or will- r. as come to describe those reakthroughs to the public sphere ; heart, and dialysis can replace 1d metal and flesh, or otherwise acteristic of technorganic ive technologies to improve son made the news when he had less vision. His partner, Moon there’s an earthquake. ted ways. In particular, e has one; age has become 1s of accessibility affix mobiles to s, “With our reliance on mobile last thing at night, would we feel Infinity and Beyond This progression further and further into technorganic territory is both sinister and tantalizingly embryonic. Sinister, because we don’t know what the consequences might be of meddling with nature in the way that we have been and continue to do; sinister because we may not have the full knowledge of anatomy and humanity—down to the minutest atom—to pursue such experimentation. It’s tantalizingly embryonic though because the potential is immense, and we've only just begun to unearth the possibilities. As Steve Mizrach writes in “The Ethics of the Cyborg,” “The computer now offers the human race the opportunity to transcend limitations of intellect, strength, and longevity previously ‘programmed’ into its DNA by eons of evolution.” While we don’t know everything about anatomy and humanity, what if we can’t gain understanding except through the use of these ominous technologies? Still, the consequences could be substantial, and they are not to be discounted. There’s already significant disparity amongst people, through economic differences, prejudices, and inequity; technological superiority, ingrained into your very being, could conceivably aggravate those differences. Mizrach asks us to imagine a dystopian divide between the “biological haves and have-nots,” with the technologically repurposed removed from the myriad sufferances of the regular old human plebeians. If we venture down the rabbit hole of simulation, innovation, and a marriage of metal and muscle, there is no turning back. We'd better be pretty sure about our collective ability to manage—or to introduce cyborg ethics, as Mizrach advocates. There’s no telling how far we could go, but that also begs the question of how far we should go. It’s bizarre to think of a world of cyborgs, and it might very well be a dangerous prospect with our propensity for prejudice, lack of knowledge, and lack of foresight. Nonetheless, I don’t see that uncertainty deterring our collective curiosity or drive to improve our societies and ourselves; and I think as long as we remain aware of the possibility for disaster, we'll curb ourselves where we venture too far. We'll stumble, we'll experiment, and we'll find our way—phantom mobile phones clutched in our magnetically-implanted hands. With the innovation of petri-grown meat on the horizon, and our own gradually increasing simulation, we are, naturally, not entirely natural and not entirely synthetic. We seemingly exist in tension, with discordant opposites coexisting in something like harmony. It’s a brave, bold new world, with the potential for exponential growth or exponential decline—or perhaps something completely different.