Summer reading list JIMMY CHLIBOYKO t really is quite depressing, walking Js any bookstore these days. Actually, a clarification: walking “into any bookstore that is not in a mall. (Mall bookstores typically have larger computer book sections than poetry sections: where does this society want to go today?) Whether it specializes in magazines, or books, or whether it does or does not have a cozy little coffee shop, a good bookstore emphasizes the heartbreaking truth: the overwhelming amount of good reading material is enough to make one desire illiteracy. You can never get to even a fraction of it. You are always looking over your shoulder for the next juicy one that the reviewers are going on about. It is torture. But if you think that is depressing, try logging onto the Web. If you are a just a neophyte, or if your WWW interest is more of a functional thing, then perhaps you haven't yet checked out any of the fine reading available in the Web’s electronic magazines nowadays. Strangely, as the technology gets stronger, it seems so does the writing. There is enough of it to make you want to smote your own eyeballs. The bloom of fine e-reading has been a while in coming. Perhaps tech- nology had lent the upstart e-zines the sheen of respectability. Sure, good writing is a dime a dozen, but writing and cool graphics! Watch out. sites, though, seem to keep ry to a minimum. Salon, le, has static pictures, no irri- JavaScript (not even on the ads) SALON MAGAZINE August 1998 Page 16 Reading for fun... and as far as frames go, the site seems positively rivetless. For all of the knick-knackery of the WWW, the most memorable sites are those that contain the best writing. Do not be put off by the anti-Internet hype: every form of publishing is prone to hoaxes and sketchy sources. Palpable mags, even up until now, haye been sloughing off their distant e-cousins, based largely on the “nature” of the Net, showing the reading public exactly who the Philistines are. Salon (www.salonmagazine.com) The big daddy of ’zines. Has been denigrated aggressively, and often, by the ancient, agenda- driven Wall Street Journal. This, however, also acts as a testament to Salon's quality. Salon could be described as a daily, with a new cover story that shows up at about 6pm, even on the weekends. The cover stories remain on the home page for upwards of a week, minimized after 24 hours into hypertext, or kept in archives. Though largely America-centric, the content is anything from the latest on the tube to the latest on Clinton's pants to the latest on the sex colum- nists’ pants, but it pursues its stories with a depth and a critical eye that is lacking from other media outlets this side of Brill’s Content. Graphically, it is an understated site, but impressive with intriguing and art- ful “splash pages” which introduce sto- ries. And Salon often hires. But who would want to make American dollars in San Francisco? Nerve (www.nervemag.com) Sex with discretion. Visually, anyway. Nerve is self-described literate smut, pieces of writing— stories and essays— that attempt to captur the intellectual side of slap-and-tickle. The cheesecake is not miss- ing, but takes the form of dour photo essays, more statement than salacious- ness. It was quite impressive when it first came out, but the long time between new dispatches makes it a lit- tle aggravating to follow. Word (www.word.com) "ox ) currently being reworked, but the site Up again, and down again, and soon to be up again after a long hiatus. It is is still worth visiting. Whimsical graphics and inventive essays and an odd sense of humour (the current main feature of the site is a retro- looking photo—Farrah Fawcett hair, steamy camera shutter and a dated, willowy font proclaiming the “Summe of Wanking”) make for an engaging mix There is a random feature selector which allows someone to sample some of the latest dispatches, though in two tries, the random generator came up with the same story—that of a man going through his collection of phone numbers he’s received from potential lovers and the story behind each of them. Interestingly, the writer requests feedback; which one, if any, should he pursue,