VOLUME XIII, NUMBER 27 3 INNOVATION ABS TRACTS PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STAFF AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (NISOD), COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, * _ THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN + WITH SUPPORT FROM THE W. K. KELLOGG FOUNDATION AND THE SID W. RICHARDSON fel ice ALC: Activating Learning in the Classroom The faculty participants say: “The ALC Program is a time to reflect—a hardworking sabbatical.” “I know it is a little corny, but I feel as if my teaching is being celebrated.” The students participating in the Activat- ing Learning in the Classroom classes say: “The Course Guide asked us to supply our own input and feelings—I loved it! If every class had something like this, I think I would like school better.” “It’s been a while since I had fun in the classroom. I need that kind of attention to do well. Thanks for letting me be myself, not my student number.” What in this program produces such positive reviews from both faculty and students? The ALC Program considers the crucial elements present in any classroom learning environment and then focuses on the three variables of the classroom equation: instructors«>information« students (to be read in either direction). The instructor’s task is to facilitate learning, and the students’ task is to learn. But how? There is a process to teaching as there is a process to learning. In order to activate these processes, ALC offers an instructor the opportunity to stand back from a course and consider each of its ingredients. Instruc- tors analyze their own styles of teaching, the thinking of their students, and the materials in their course. They clarify their goals for the course, then ponder the most cfiective ways to motivate a varied group of students to embrace them. Once these questions have been considered, the instructors begin the challenge of translating their ideas about the classroom component into a Course Guide. Thus, the Guide, which is developed for each ALC course, reflects the individuality of the instructor and connects the students to the experience of learning. It serves as a concrete avenue for faculty members to try out new approaches to presenting material, and it provides a way for students to experience supportive and personal comments from the instructor as they work through the course material. Pretend that you are a student arriving on the first day for your humanities course. You settle into your chair and open up the large Course Guide that the professor has just handed to you. On the first page, you see the following information: The Course Guide (this huge notebook sitting in front of you right now) will help guide you through the course material. It contains: e acalendar for the semester; e¢ maps—for identifying the areas about which we will be studying; e journal entry questions (more details on these later on); © previewing exercise—to introduce you to the texts you will be reading for this course and give you a preview (before you begin reading) of useful background material and relevant information outside the actual “body” of the text; e reading Guide question—to help you focus on and respond to the material you will be reading in preparation for class; * occasional pithy, personal, wise, and whimsical comments from me; and e other oddments and errata. You will find that you are asked to write a lot— perhaps more than you’ ve been used to in other courses—on your thoughts about topics to be discussed in class, answers to specific questions, questions you want answered. But it’s your interaction with the “stuff” of this course that will make it more worthwhile—for you and for the rest of us. Now, on to some of the requirements and expectations. What do you think? You probably have a sense that this professor is well prepared, but you also get a feeling that you will be an active pa* icipant in the THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STAFF AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (NISOD) Community College Leadership Program, Department of Educational Administration College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin, EDB 348, Austin, Texas 78712