Thursday, Sept. 25, 1980. This year, once again, the student societys’ biggest problem is student apathy. Or is it? Is student apathy a problem at all? It would not be an unreasonable statement to say that the disinteres: of most students in student society activities is not a problem, but rather a natural occurence that should be accepted by the student society as healthy. Perhaps student apathy is not where the problem lies. Perhaps it is the student society's expectations of the students that is the real problem. What does the society expect students to do? Run around supporting every event they dream up. The function of the college is to provide éducation for those who want ot. The extra cirricular activities are supposed to be optional and those students who choose not to engage in them do not deserve the derogatory label, apathetic. They are not obligated to attend them, therefore they should not be criticized for not doing so. If an activity is poorly supported, apathetic students should not be blamed for ruining it. The failure should be taken as a signal for teh student society to consider the laws of supply and demand; if the students are not showing a demand for the services then the society should consider stopping or reducing that service. Because some students enjoy being active in the happenings around the college and others are really not interested in them, it does not seem fair that the non-active person should have to support the active one with his student fees. It is not a crime to be inactive, and a penalty for it should not be paid. Last spring semester the faculty and staff were allowed to participate in student society activities if they paid the same fees as the students. Those who took the opportunity used it a lot. Few students used the facilities available as much a those who voluntarily paid the fee because they wanted to take part in the activities. No staff member who didn't want to support the activities didn’t have to pay for them. The student society should initiate a similar plan for students. Of course, some fees would still have to be paid by all the students to cover for fixed costs but a more fair “pay as you play’’ system should be introduced. BIll Day, principal of the New Westminster campus, was the fret ever recipient of the infamous red brick award. We couldn't find out why he got it but we are sure that he deserved it. Maybe he just wanted to see his picture in the paper. Whatever he did we are certainly pleased that the award was claimed and not simply allowed to drift into extinction. We can now sit back and speculate about which of our prestigious administrators will merit the honour of next weeks prize. Everyone is cheering for their favourite bureaucrat and there is little doubt that thousands of dollars will change hands after each announce ment. . The: teflect th: The Other Press page four Mess Dear Other Pressers Can you explain (or can anyone) to a stunned student Other Press; } would print such absolute newly furnished grossness on the front page of (stundent) why, with a newly painted, cafeteria, the adult students here at New West campus can not put their garbbage in the tins? Why waste the money to improve the cafeteria facil- ities when it seems the stu- dents don’t care. Most days I have to clean up food wrap- : pers, coffee cups, coffee spills and other garbage before I cn eat. It tends to upset the appetite. Any suggestions? M. Chase P.S. What are the chances of taking photos of the mess on the tables after a large lunch break? And why not institute a ‘Big Pigs’ table of the week? Other Press pix meet disapproval photograph on the front page Dear Editor of this years’ first issue. “The Please reply to this letter in your next issue of ‘‘The Other Press’’. No wonder you call it ’’ no other press Thank You Yours Truly C.B. Tompkins . its paper. This display of ugliness, especially it being the first issue of the year, really shows the editor's in- different attitude towards what people like to see. A Thankyou for your lovely student needs a lift now and comment on our photograph. then, not a downer like your ‘ , A photograph implies. fa this We're so glad you liked it! t world there's enough ugli- Have you ever thought o ness, we shouldn't have to becoming a nun or a preach- put it on the front of our €t? You and Anita Brvant * school newspaper. I might be should form an organization. over-reacting, but then so are |!'™ sure your purity would ; Tsp indeed benefit the world. In Oiner STOP etunentsy BTS reply to WHY we printed the students would like to hear picture, WE LIKED IT! Need the rationale behind thiswe say more. Dear C.B. Tompkins photograph on the front page.