VOLUME XI, NUMBER 9 #% INNOVATION ABSTRACTS PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STAFF AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN PORT FROM THE W..K. KELLOGG FOUNDATION AND THE SID W. RICHARDSON FOUNDATION It’s All in the Cards! Lotteries, playing the odds, and gambling are social, enjoyable, and sometimes addictive activities. They do not create visions of students reviewing notes or formu- lating thoughts. However, an instructional modifica- tion of these activities can be used to stimulate thought, actively engage students in learning, and build camara- derie. Further, it can serve as a method of focusing attention, learning others’ names, and encouraging participation. Preparation During the first class meeting, students put their names (as they wish to be addressed in class) on 3" x 5" cards. Nicknames are encouraged. Students are in- formed that these index cards will be used in a “volun- teering” system to answer class questions. [Please note that the procedure for using the cards should be described only after they are collected. One year, a more “spirited” class was told, before collection, how the index cards would be used; as a result, about one- third of the cards bore the name of one popular stu- dent.] The Game At the beginning of the second class day, five or six questions reviewing material from the previous class are written on the overhead or blackboard. The index cards are shuffled, held face down, and one card is drawn by a student. This student reads the name on the card aloud, and the student whose name was called is allowed to select any question he/she prefers to answer. If this “volunteer” is successful, his/her card is sepa- rated from the rest, and the process continues. If the answer is incorrect, the instructor can either give the correct response or ask other questions designed to help the student “discover” the correct answer. Care must be taken not to embarrass or degrade the student. Whether successful or not, this student is allowed to select the next card and read the name of the next “volunteer.” This process continues until all the review questions have been answered. By continually separating the “volunteers” from the others, students who have not participated know that their chances of being “volunteers” are improving. Students seem to enjoy trading barbs when their names are called; likewise, some students vow a friendly revenge. Once all students have “played,” the cards are reshuffled, and the process begins again. After the first few class periods, students have settled into the procedure. Once the instructor begins writing, the students immediately quict down and begin skim- ming over thcir notes. The Rules Students will answer at least one question aloud during the semester. This creates a little motivation because most students want to demonstrate their knowledge and ability to classmates. With a class of 30, this daily 10-minute process will have actively engaged all students in approximately five class meetings. Students are informed that this activity has no effect on their final course grade. Asa result, it becomes a no- risk situation. Students are allowed to say, “I don’t know.” They are informed that this response will work a couple of times, but not forever. However, once a student answers, “! don’t know,” that response triggers a brief review of the related material. Variations If you sense boredom with this approach, add varicty by writing a “bonus” question. No information about the question is made available until the student selects it. If the student volunteers for that question (as op- posed to its being the only question left), praise him/ her for the curiosity. At times, several bonus questions can be made available in sealed envelopes. It all adds to the fun! Conclusion During one semester I used this activity once or twice a weck. The following semester, in a sequential course, I didn’t use it at all. About half of the students told me that they missed the activity, thought it was useful, and that it made the class more interesting. James W. Taylor, Director, Cardiorespiratory Care For further information, contact the author at Kalama- z00 Valley Community College, 6767 West O Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI 49009. EDB 348, Austin, Texas 78712 THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STAFF AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ( NISOD) Community College Leadership Program, The University of Texas at Austin