issue 20// vol 47 Why I dont resonate with soccer > It’s the main sport in every other continent Mo Hussain Sports Reporter Aw of weeks ago we covered why occer is the most popular sport in the world. While many people around the world consider it the number one sport, that doesn’t seem to necessarily be the case for North Americans and myself. One of the main reasons I personally don't resonate with soccer as much as other sports is the fact that that matchups can possibly end in draws. That means that there is a possibility of the game ending without any scoring on either team. How can someone possibly invest over go minutes of their time into watching a sport that runs the risk of not having a decisive ending? Imagine being in a marquee European city, paying tons of money for tickets to watch their professional soccer team, only to see both teams draw. To the people that don’t mind it, I salute you. But to people that are used to sports that have decisive endings, this can be a somewhat problematic. An obvious counter to this is that it’s obviously not always the case that matchups can end in a draw. Tournaments like the FIFA World Cup and in the UEFA Champions league don’t end in draws, and I quite enjoy watching those when I get the chance. However, that is not the case for most major leagues in the regular season. Another argument one could make is that that due to the game being played on such a large field, players can get tired, and it could take a long time to finish a game, which leads me to my next point. Since soccer is played on such a large field, this could also contribute to why there is not enough scoring relative to other sports. If we compare soccer to a sport like basketball for instance (my favourite sport for full disclosure), one study found the most common score in a soccer game is 1 to o compared to NBA teams averaging about 40 field goals a game. This, in addition to the fact that the sport isn’t as physical as some popular sports like hockey and American football (which is probably a good thing for the The difference between baseball and cricket » These sports may seem like twins but have essential differences Mo Hussain Sports Reporter Agr of weeks back, we brought up how cricket was one of the most popular sports in the world. What came to my attention when drafting the story up was the shocking resemblance cricket has with baseball, and what the heck could be so different between each sport. One of the primary differences between baseball and cricket is obviously who watches the sport. I think it’s safe to say that baseball is popular within North and South America in countries such as the United States, the Dominican Republic, and Canada. On the other hand, cricket is popular on the eastern side of the globe in countries such as India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Another difference is that the sports play in very contrasted field types. In baseball, the field is in a diamond shape; in cricket, the field is shaped almost like an oval. One would assume the main reason for this is because the shapes of those fields play a big role in how a team can score. Although both sports essentially require someone with a bat to hit the ball in a strategic way, the two sports also have different systems for scoring. After the person with the bat in baseball (the batter) hits the ball as best as they can, their objective is to run around the three “bases” on the field and make it back to the original spot where they hit the ball before the other team catches it and brings it back themselves. In cricket, the batsman (person who bats the ball in cricket) essentially has to hit the ball in a way that either passes the boundary line (similar to a home run) or hits it in a way where they would have enough sports // no. 7 player’s well being), puts it at somewhat of a disadvantage when it comes to entertainment value. time to cross a line in front of them. There are obviously more differences, but it is interesting to see some of the key differences the two sports have, because someone who isn’t familiar with either sport could potentially mix the two up. Photo by Arnaldo Fragozo