Our ‘1984,’ George Orwellian future (¥ |spent New Year's alone at home and you should too (¥ Our likely future And more! may be closer than we think > Net neutrality is just the beginning Jessica Berget Opinions Editor nour present social and political climate, many people strongly believe that we are already living in, or headed straight for a dystopian, George Orwell’s “1984”-esque future, complete with doublethink, perpetual war, and the ever-famous Big Brother watching over us at all times. This ultimately comes as no surprise; people have been claiming that we're living in “1984” ever since the book first came out. However, with the recent repeal of net neutrality in the US, the illegal way in which it was done, and Canada possibly following closely in their footsteps, the possibility of living in an authoritative, brainwashing society like the one Orwell describes in his novel might not be very far in the future. T honestly believe that we are indeed living in a war-mongered, brainwashed, surveillance heavy society, but not nearly to the degree of Orwell’s famous book. Yes, war seems to be breaking out, or is at the very least on the verge of it nearly everywhere we look in the news, many people are addicted to smart phones, news about celebrities who have no reason for being famous, fabricated, or biased news reports are flooding our social media accounts, and there are several surveillance cameras nearly everywhere we go. Kelly Anne Conway’s use of the term “alternative facts” doesn't really put anyone at ease, but compared to the totalitarian conditions of the society described in “1984,” we have a long way to go to accurately describe our society as a “dystopia.” In Western society, we still have a lot of freedoms and rights that many countries presently do not have. I think it’s dramatic for people to claim that we are all already living in “1984.” This is one major problem I find with claiming that we presently live in a dystopian society, it is heavily centred on Western society conditions. There are many countries that are living with an authoritative government, little to no internet freedoms, face the horrors of war daily, or all the above. Take North Korea, China, or anywhere in the Middle East, for example. These are countries that fit more closely within the rubric of being a dystopia, yet I have heard no one claim that they are living the George Orwellian society that we fear so much. It seems that if Western society isn’t dealing with these conditions, then no one is. The repeal of net neutrality in the US is only the first taste of what it is like to live in a society that controls the media and content we can view, much like in Orwell’s book, and it seems Canada will be the next country to follow. According to a report by Canadaland, Major Canadian companies such as Bell, Rogers, Shaw, Cineplex, and Quebec-based theatre company Cinemas Guzzo are pushing the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commissions (CRTC) to create an organization called the Internet Piracy Review Agency (IPRA) in the name of blocking piracy, and yes, this should scare you. Blocking any content from the internet is a slippery slope. Once one Illustration by Cara Seccafien thing is blocked, there will be other groups with reasons to block other things, thus leading us down a dark path of absolute net neutrality, and when major telecom corporations are involved, the outcome is never good, as we've seen with our American neighbours. Although we are not yet living ina “1984”-esque society, it is something we should be wary of. It may happen when we least expect it, or we may not even realize it’s happening at all. Globalism shouldn't be a bad word > The world can become better with more connection Greg Waldock Staff Writer « lobalism” is a scary word. Some see it as a group of wealthy elites using international organizations like the United Nations to make profits at the expense of the working class. Others see it as the result of colonialism and Western intervention over the past centuries in countries around the world, encouraging modern slavery and political instability. While I believe that these both contain elements of the truth—especially the latter—I also believe they completely miss what globalism really is: Humanity’s greatest opportunity to improve itself. On an international scale, the most notable impact of globalism isn’t violent coups or assassinations—it’s interdependency. All nations in the world rely on other nations in some way to survive and progress. Take creating a microscope to study bacteria for developing cures for example. The glass of the microscope must come from certain regions in the Middle East, refined into glass in factories in Western Europe, using foundry parts made efficiently in China, shipped using boats constructed in India, and delivered to American buyers who need to have hands in all these countries. That interdependency for materials is an analogy for global trade as a whole. Miss one part, and our ability to make cures for diseases and advance the sciences halts completely. If we can refine this process with time, it’s entirely possible to have global trade systems that don’t use sweatshops to cut costs or treat their workers inhumanely. Ona personal level, globalism opens the door for new and vibrant forms of self-expression. The 2oth and 21st centuries have been golden ages of artistic expression, with entire new art forms emerging every handful of years through cultural interpretation and fusion. For example, Pablo Picasso fused Spanish and African, Greek, and American styles into his own unique vision, creating entire genres. Art like this creates a common ground for people to share experiences and worldviews; through globalism, people were able to connect with each other on a more metaphorical level than mass communication. Ultimately, globalism will be what we make it. We're far better off embracing it and working to correct its wrongs than we would be dismissing it as mere elitism or colonialism—while it is both, it is also so much more. "Les Femmes d’Alger’ by Pablo Picasso