Marijuana 1s not harmless > Debunking the myths around pot Cazzy Lewchuk Opinions Editor believe that marijuana is significantly less harmful than most drugs out there are. It is especially less dangerous than alcohol and cigarettes, both substances that kill thousands each year, yet are still legal. Despite marijuana’s relative safe use—particularly in moderation—it is not a harmless drug. It does not have the same physiological effects that other substances do, as it is impossible to die of a weed overdose, and it does not have the physical effects that cause addiction. However, it does have many unpleasant side effects, both short and long-term. Perhaps the most damaging aspect of pot is the fact that it’s (usually) a form of smoking. While it does not contain the many, many harmful chemicals that cigarettes do, pulling smoke into one’s lungs is still not a healthy thing to do. Over time, it can and does cause breathing problems, damage to the lungs, and futher issues for those with respiratory conditions such as asthma. While marijuana is not physically addictive, dependency and psychological addictions are very real. Many can get addicted to the feeling of being high all the time. People with addictive personalities are particularly likely to get hooked on pot. Marijuana can be, and frequently is, used for medicinal purposes. Although I'd bet most of the “medical marijuana” dispensary customers are not solely using the product for health reasons, weed can genuinely treat many conditions. On the other side, marijuana is seen by some as a miracle drug and proper substitute for actual medication. For example, it may behave as a painkiller and aid the side effects of chemotherapy, but it is not an alternative for the actual cancer- fighting drugs, nor the chemo itself. On a recreational and medicinal level, the social stigma has clouded knowledge on weed’s side effects. It remains illegal and a social taboo, leading to a lack of education. Facts matter in determining weed’s effect on society, and restricting access to information helps no one. Many studies on pot’s long-term effects on the body and in its potential medicinal uses have been deterred due to the drug’s social and legal standing. The fact that marijuana’s full side-effects are not yet fully known should be a Let he without a problematic fave cast the first stone > Guilty by association... or not Rebecca Peterson Humour Editor He: something I’ve been thinking a lot about recently: It’s really easy to get annoyed when people you like don’t hate the same people you do. I remember this used to really bother me as a kid, because honestly, everything bothered me when I was a kid. It’s part of why I’m on medication now. Even so, as with most decent writers and comedians, I’ve had my share of bullies, and I couldn't understand why other kids in the class who weren't bullies were friends with such assholes. Could they not see that the eight-year-old girl that called me a freak was filled with unspeakable evil? Were they blind to the hellfire burning deep within that third-grader’s eyes? Tread a lot of books—specifically, a lot of Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter, over and over—so | had a pretty clear-cut sense of good and evil. I figured good people were good people and evil people were evil people. So when good people went to evil people’s slumber parties and signed their grade seven yearbook, my worldview was thrown entirely for a loop. Thankfully, I became older, wiser, and—as previously mentioned— medicated, and I developed a healthy zen about the whole thing. “One man’s asshole is another man’s bestie,” I mused. Image v via nymag.com Felix Kjellberg After all, I’ve had friends with asshole friends, and I have, arguably, been that asshole friend. In all our interconnected social networks, it just doesn’t make sense to drop good people out of your life because they occasionally have bad taste. I think this is a principle most of us can get behind, so here’s where it gets tricky: applying it to public figures. I was recently disappointed by a YouTuber I like after she posted a video in which she called herself a “huge fan” of YouTuber, real name Felix Kjellberg, PewDiePie in response to public criticism for an absurdly racist “practical joke” he played in January. I’m not here to argue over Felix Kjellberg’s actions, whether they were racist (they were) or if he deserved to be cut from his deal with Disney because of them (he did). I have never been a fan of Felix Kjellberg, but I have been a long-time fan of the YouTuber supporting him, and it hurt that she didn’t seem to understand the very real pain that people suffered because of his “joke,” especially in such a turbulent time. She received a lot of criticism for her comments, criticism that she joked about and brushed off instead of taking seriously, which was also frustrating to watch. On Twitter, however, I saw another favourite YouTuber of mine talk about the matter, someone who'd met Felix Kjellberg a few times. All he said was that he didn’t support Felix Kjellberg’s actions, but that when he'd met the man in person he seemed like a “nice guy.” Suddenly this YouTuber was inundated with messages from various anonymous internet people calling him a “literal Nazi,” among other things, for essentially saying something kind about a friend. A shitty friend, but a friend, nonetheless. Do I think Felix Kjellberg is a nice guy? No. I also haven't met him, but I doubt meeting him would change my opinion. I’m certain some of the messages sent to the YouTubers who didn’t indict Felix Kjellberg for his actions were well thought-out and appropriate arguments attempting to educate rather than lambast and attack. However, I also cause for concern on their own. As Canada prepares for legalization, it is vital that accurate information on marijuana is available. There are many ways to invoke harm reduction and to use pot responsibly. This involves not only signage and Health Canada recommendations where weed is sold, but education in schools as well. Frankly, I would support this for all types of drugs, including alcohol. The amount of misinformation and abuse that comes from people simply not knowing the effects of what’s going into their bodies is truly frightening. If one is going to use marijuana, one should know the true side- effects. Whether youre pro- or anti- pot, understanding what the drug actually does is essential before we make any other judgments on it. recognize that these YouTubers get millions of comments every day, ranging from sweet to bat-shit insane. It’s much more likely that they’d stand with a fellow YouTuber, rather than change an opinion they ve formed from their own experiences based on the words from millions of anonymous voices. I'm still disappointed, of course, just like I was back when everyone thought one of my bullies was the coolest girl on the playground, even as she mocked my (admittedly horrible) dancing in front of everyone and tried to convince the other girls not to shop at the same stores I got my clothes from. That, of course, isn’t on the same level as posting a video using people of colour to display an anti-Semitic message worldwide, and as I am neither Jewish nor a person of colour I know I have quite a lot of privilege coming in on this issue. It’s easier for me to try to shrug off my disappointment and still enjoy watching videos by YouTubers who do not actively condemn his actions. The problem with seeing people as objectively good or objectively evil is that very few truly evil people exist. The world is largely made up of decent people and less-decent people who do horrible things sometimes. It doesn’t excuse these things, or the people who do them—far from—but maybe we can cut their friends a break if they seem, for the most part, to be relatively okay.