Bind. Everything that’s wrong with Canadian music Part one of a two-part rant am nota Ja lumberjack or Schreiber a fur trader. I don’t live in an igloo or eat blubber and it’s pronounced “zed” not “zee!” My country has produced some of the greatest contributions to the arts and has helped shape the world we live in. I am proud to be a part of this good natured, friendly nation and find comfort in the level of respect that Canadians garner internationally (especially in comparison to the Americans). That being said, the top three things that this country has produced that I am least proud of, in no particular order, are as followed: Stephen Harper, the Toronto Blue Jays and our internationally popular music. In this first instalment of a two part rant, I hope to hit all the highs and tear into all the lows of the Canadian music scene... respectfully, of course. When it comes to quality musical exports, most of the goods are from artists who were known “back in the day.” For example, the Guess Who and BTO are amongst the best and most respected rock groups of the 1960s and 70s. Hits like “American Woman” and “Taking Care of Business” still flood the airwaves south of the 49", and shine a light on Canada’s music history. As for folk music, Canada is best represented by such artist as Leonard Cohen, Gordon Lightfoot and Joni Mitchell. These performers have reached international acclaim and have won many awards for their work. The sad part though, is that nobody who was born after the freaky time we all know as the 70s have a single clue who they are. Many of the songs by these artists, such as Joni Mitchell’s “Big Yellow Taxi” or Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” have been redone by younger, more popular artists, and the original work has long since been forgotten. So where did it all go wrong? Where was the first sour jug of milk in the carton? In many people’s eyes, it was after the 80s when popular music underwent a coup d’état, but in my opinion it happened way earlier than that. In the 1970s a Canadian folk singer by the name of Neil Young came out of the woodwork and quickly emerged as a popular and fresh face, changing the scene of Canadian music by mixing folk with rock. Neil Young isn’t the most talented of artists; in fact, his artistic vision could easily be confused with that of a drunkard. In the 60s Crosby Stills and Nash were formed by some of the best rock performers of the day. Later, after several years, they joined forces with Neil Young to create Crosby Stills Nash and Young, the premiere “super group.” It was at this point in time that all of that music began to suck. To me, Neil Young ruined the once well-balanced trio with his one noted solos and pitch-less vocals. His song writing didn’t add much and sadly that is one of his only redeeming qualities. Now, I will proceed on to one of the most disgraceful bands to be blessed with the title of being Canadian: Rush. Rush is a group full of talented musicians that in an attempt to put it to good use force my ears to bleed. Rush created a genre now known as “Math Rock” and thus combined something I truly love with something I absolutely despise. When was the last time you were listening to a groovin’ track, and thought about doing quadratic equations? I’ve heard all kinds of Rush fans say that “You just don’t understand their complex style” or “They may not rock as hard, but they’re technically brilliant.” Yes, they are technically brilliant, but looking at it from an outsider’s perspective, rock music isn’t supposed to be technical and well thought out; it goes against the nature of the genre! And don’t give me this “not understanding” bullshit, I’m a music major—I understand full well what they’re doing and a lot of the time signature changes are just arrogant attempts to make a lame song more interesting. FAIL! Geddy Lee sounds like a woman! There, I said it. Neil Peart has some quality solos, but on a large scale, the man just tries too hard. Guitar is actually one of the least interesting aspects of this band, and further proves my theory of Rush missing the point of what it means to play rock. Next week, for part two, we will discuss the nitty-gritty of Canadian music, as we dare to venture into the post-1980s. Madame Tutli-Putli a fine example of Canadian film By Leah Drewbrook reated by Chris Lavis and Maclek ( Szczerbowski, Madame Tutli-Putli is about one woman’s journey into the unknown on a midnight train—leaving behind her past and travelling towards an ambiguous future. With the sudden turning on of bright lights, like the ones you might find lighting a football field, the film begins. Moths disperse through the air and a slow, sad melody plays in the background. Madame Tutli-Putli then appears —trailing behind her a record player, a beach ball, a bird cage, rocking chairs, mirrors and picture frames. It is obvious from the conditions of the objects alone; Madame Tutli-Putli is weathered, tattered and fragile. When Madame Tutli-Putli is first revealed she is hunched over from the weight of the baggage she is carrying, looks tired and sad and does not appear excited about leaving or traveling. Nor should she—what is in store for Madam Tutli-Putli includes many strange encounters, odd characters and alternate realities. In one instance, the train stops in the middle of a forest. Everyone falls fast asleep, except for Madame Tutli-Putli. The train seems to be some futuristic invention; a blue light that shoots from the front to the back of the train acts as a 14 security system. As Madame Tutli-Putli begins to write a letter, three men jump down from an electrical wire above the train. They enter the train and replace the “clean air” system with a system that releases a green mist which then pours out of the vents and knocks the passengers unconscious. The train, using its futuristic technology, seems to “sense” the thieves and consequently begins to race out of control through the forest leaving a trail of fire on both sides of the track. When Madame Tutli-Putli wakes, she is alone in the compartment; the baggage and other passengers gone. Madame Tutli-Putli then runs through the train until she trips and falls to the ground in the dining car. There, once again, she finds a moth, which flutters before her. Madame Tutli-Putli follows the moth through a door and into a bright light. The outline of the moth becomes hazy and slowly fades into a woman’s body with wings. The last scene is a silhouette of trees on a foggy blue background. After watching the film I became confused. What had happened to Madame Tutli-Putli? After thinking about her sad demeanour and baggage, coupled with her fascination for the moth I came to the conclusion that in fact Madame Tutli-Putli had transformed herself into a moth, and proceeded to fly away. Although this is just personal speculation, I believe she morphed into the moth in hopes of improving her life. In addition to the film, the DVD special features are not to be missed! Chris Lavis’ and Maclek Szczerbowski’s explain the inspiration for the film, as well as the gruelling process they undertook in order to create it. The amount of time Lavis and Szcerbowski spent on the film is unbelievable. To make Madam Tutli-Putli more life-like, they integrated half gestures and hesitations to make her seem unsure and timid. Consequently, this detail made production time very long and strenuous. Lavis and Szcerbowski worked 14-15 hour days seven days a week for two years to complete the animation of Madame Tutli- Putli. They then spent half a year on the animation of the train alone! In order to capture the mood of the night train the pair also took a two-week train trip, filming out the windows and watching how the passengers sat, slept, reacted to things, and how the movement of the train affected their balance. Between the fluidity of the animation, considering it is stop-motion and labour intensive, and the realism of Madam Tutli’s character, the film was amazing. A true Canadian story at heart, with its depiction of the Canadian National Railway and the occasional moose, Madame Tutli-Putli is a film that does our nation proud! It was one of the best short films I have ever seen and I would definitely recommend it to anyone.