www.theotherpress.ca Opinions. Internet-tention deficit disorder Untangling the web By Natalie Serafini, Opinions Editor Ba and outlandish of an addiction as it might sound, Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) has become a prevalent part of many peoples’ daily lives. Granted, it doesn’t connote the same absurdity as the plethora of follies seen on My Strange Addiction; yet it’s difficult to think of the Internet—in the infancy of its existence, but so mucha part of society—as a threat to anyone’s functioning. Still, this is an issue that concerns university and college students, as studies show that rates of Internet addiction are higher amongst youth and young adults worldwide. Internet addicts often cannot disentangle themselves from the Web, might lie to friends and family about their attachment, and may begin to see their obsession taking a toll on their work. No doubt about it, IAD can bea serious obstacle to overcome. I think, though, that addiction to technology and the Web could be seen as a spectrum, and that most people fall somewhere— however mild or extreme—on that spectrum. For months now, I’ve had difficulty finishing off an entire Premature exoneration Forgiving too soon is a bad idea By Natalie Serafini, Opinions Editor [ns took a course on conflict resolution. Between learning about active listening and how to ask open-ended questions, we learned about conflict resolution styles. Everyone has a certain way in which they deal with confrontations and arguments, and they generally fall into one of the categories of win/lose, problem solving, accommodating, compromise, and avoidance. It was immediately obvious to me what style of conflict resolution I subscribe to, since I avoid conflict as much as book. It isn’t for lack of trying, or for lack of time, but more an inability to focus. Although I’ve been blaming the absence of books in my life on the amount of textbook reading inherent to college life, I’m coming to the conclusion that the problem is an unhealthy attachment to the Web. I spend a substantial amount of time online, and sometimes find myself falling asleep while watching YouTube videos. I wouldn’t say I’m addicted to the Internet, but I could probably redirect a good chunk of my time towards healthier and more productive pursuits. Obviously there’s a lot to love about the Net—otherwise it wouldn’t lure people in with such ease. We all know that it makes communication and learning simpler, with Facebook, Twitter, news sites, and databases a few tip-tap-types away. The online connections also make social movements and campaigns much easier to share. Occupy Wall Street began as a social media movement, and our Facebook timelines still show the imprints that Kony 2012 left behind. The Internet facilitates self-expression, debate, and access to images of cats. It’s better than Disneyland, as far as I’m concerned. Still, those delightful aspects begin to be eclipsed by the health and psychological possible. While I’ve never been one for confrontations, I’ve also never been one to easily let go of problems. This probably has a lot to do with the fact that I avoid conflict: I don’t end up asserting that I’m pissed off, making it harder to forgive and forget. I recently had to deal with my aversion to burying the hatchet, and of course came up against the same old problem: I couldn’t let go. This certainly had to do with the fact that I'd been simmering in a stew of avoidance for over a year, but it was also related to the significance of forgiveness. When you forgive someone, you absolve them of wrongness. They should no longer feel contrite or apologetic. The past is purposefully hemmed back into the past, and there’s a sense of finality to it. effects of technology and the Internet. A phenomenon known as phantom cell phone syndrome involves thinking you feel your phone vibrating in your pocket, and finding nothing there. Studies have begun to tentatively link social anxiety and depression to excessive computer use. Other studies have suggested that the craving for online gaming and the Internet is comparable to cravings seen in substance addictions. And there are the health issues associated with staring at a computer screen for hours at a time: headaches, eye strain, and slumped posture are just some short-term effects of excessive computer use. I bothered by the physical health consequences of stooped posture and failing eyesight—that’s what chiropractors and glasses are for, right? But the links to social anxiety, depression, and an inability to focus are disturbing. Every generation has its challenges, or some quality that marks its members as distinct from others; are we the generation of Internet addicts? I refuse to believe that we imagine sitting for hours doesn’t do wonders for long-term health, either. Again, I love the Internet, and the list of reasons why it’s great goes on much longer than the short one I made. I’m not even tremendously And yet, even though forgiveness is spoken of as meaning that anger and hurt have been abandoned, I think it’s too frequently treated as simply the end goal to an argument. Assertions of feelings are rushed through; perspectives are half-heard, half-nodded through absent- mindedly; little understanding is really established; and eyes remain on the prize. From there, instead of forgiveness being an announcement of moving forward, it becomes a Band-Aid that’s too small for the wound. A premature statement of absolution might be an attempt to gloss over problems, or maybe it’s the automatic response to an “I’m sorry.” It’s fine to recognize that feeling bad sucks, but not if it replaces asserting your perspective. Especially since stating exoneration closes the door to more discussion: once they’ve apologized and you've forgiven, what's left to say? I’m in no way suggesting that people should hold onto resentment, or that the person who’s been wronged has license to be lax in moving forward. It’s simply that, in my experience, when forgiveness is offered too soon, it isn’t entirely heartfelt. And once you’ve stated that you're ready to move forward, it’s unfair to keep bringing up the past. Granted, the expression “To err is human; to forgive, divine” exists for a reason, and maybe the world would be a better place if people didn’t cling to grudges quite so readily. But who says that forgiveness has to always be the final destination, or that the commute has to be lickety-split? Particularly with the expectation Oare irreparably linked to our technological appendages. I’m not going to suggest that we abandon the Net entirely, but hopefully there exists a manageable balance between work, school, social life, and the requisite time spent staring at a screen. that forgiven issues will be forgotten, absolution shouldn’t be meaningless. I don’t think of confrontations as boxing matches: they shouldn’t be rushed through for the goal of a KO. Confrontations should be about negotiation, and attempting to see the perspective of another person. Trying to push through an argument to arrive at some semblance of agreement often leaves too much room for not actually listening to one another. It resolves too little, leaving the door open for continued enmity, while premature exoneration closes the door to any further discussion. Once all is forgiven, all should be forgotten, but that’s a dangerous place to rush to if you harbour resentment and a good memory. 1/