Stud ents- Pawns in Strike! Once again we the students are the pawns in a game of chess between the administration and the Douglas College Faculty Association. As in chess, the pawns are expendable. In this dispute WE are the pawns at the barganing table . Each side says the students are their main concern: rubbish. We will suffer from their decisions. Unlike the staff, we can not put a strike behind us. Musi¢, Theatre, and closed enrollment students will be hit the hardest as they are unable to make-up for lost time. The D.C.F.A. will be able to pick-up where they left off. As a student , I support neither side. I sympathize with the DCFA, but they are not faultless in this dispute. Ultimately, there is the possibility that a large number of the student body will lose a semester or a year; that possibility is unacceptable. I believe students are angry at being used as pawns! We are going to be the victims of a horrible situation. Our education has yet again been put in danger. As students, we should let the DCFA,the Administration, and the government know we are as mad as hell at being used as barganing material. We are not pawns! We have a right to the education we paid for. Rachael Burnett “Women Must have the Right to Choose" The issue that won’t go away, that has kept those on Parlaiment Hill ducking for cover for almost two years now, is finally being dealt with. On Friday our federal government finally did something it has promised to do: it tabled legislation in the House on abor- tion. The thing is, this is one piece of legislation that the majority of Canadians would rather the government left alone. Not because we don’t want to deal with the issue, but because we feel any law restricting a woman’s access to a safe. abortion is a law against women. We cannot accept the legisla- tion. A woman must have complete control over what happens to her, physically, socially, economically, emotionally. Not her doctor. It’s her body, her life. Period. How many doctors are going to agree to allow a woman to go through with an abortion when the procedure is being put into the criminal code? Doctors are now left wide open to being sued by anyone who thinks their decision is wrong, including the woman’s partner/spouse, family members, even anti-choice groups. Doctors won’t even tell you when you are pregnant what sex your child is for fear of being sued if they are wrong. And that’s not a criminal offence. I don’t care how Pro-choice a doctor is, the possiblity of being sued will be all too present and may work against a woman seeking an abor- “Thank- you!” Dear Friend, Thank-you for stealing $100.00 out of my purse. I hope you needed it to buy groceries. I hope.you needed it to pay your rent. I hope you needed it to buy your 5 - year old daughter a halloween costume. I hope you needed it for bus fare. Well that’s what my daughter and I needed it for. May you spend it with a guilt-free conscience so the next time someone rips YOU off you’ ll feel good about yourself. Name withheld by request. DCSS Objects to Letter Dear Other Press, The Students’ Society objects to the allegations made by Rick Shepherd in the Oct. 23 issue of the Other Press. The equipment expen- ~ ditures approved on Oct. 10th were the result of several months of re- search on the part of Equipment Purchase Committee. The executive felt that because there were many outstanding equipment purchase directives from the fall 1988 and spring 1989 semesters, a committee should be struck to facilitate these purchases and ensure that the Society was purchasing the best equipment for the most reasonable price. It could have easily been the case that each individual purchase was approved separately, in separate meetings, but the committee felt that it was best to deal with the results of its research at one time. Mr. Shepherd could be more responsible in his research as several of his allegations are false. First, the Oct. 10 meeting was not the first meeting of the newly elected Representative Committee. Given that some purchases were directives from previous semesters, those purchases will not be coming out of the fall 1989 budget. Equip- ment purchases are not "capital ex- penditures" as such, there exists a line item in the budget to accom- Other Press tion. Also, only the woman herself can really know what’s best for her. A doctor can make an educated guess, but he/she isn’t leading that woman’s life. And that is the bot- tom line. Women must have the right to choose, for themselves, what is right for them individually, because no-one else really knows. This legislation, as tabled, takes away a woman’s right to choose. It also degrades women in general: by saying that women must have a doctor’s permission to recieve an abortion, our govern- ment is effectively saying that women can’t make intelligent, well thought out decisions about their own lives. We have to act. Now. Our government has shown us, quite convincingly, just who it is listen- ing to. The people in this country who are pro-choice have got to turn it around, have got to make them- selves heard, immediately. It is still not too late to make sure that women. of every background in Canada will continue to have ac- cess to safe abortions. The legisla- tion, if passed, will deny that access. Phone your M.P.! Today! D.C. Keeps Up With Technology It is good to see Douglas catching up in the computer world. Back in the old days of Douglas (85), all us CIS 110 students used IBM PC’s. Also all we did was program in BASIC for the whole semester. POWERHOUSE was a word we never had heard of before. Then there came a little change. The IBMs were upgraded to XTs, we even got a couple of XT turbos. We even received better printers. Also the main frame, Data General, got upgraded to a better system. Then came the computer modate purchases of that nature. It is within the purview of elected representatives to make financial decisions that affect the operations of the society. With a membership of over 6,000, only two full-time staff people to service that mem- bership, limited space and outdated equipment the Society has acted responsibly in making decisions that improve the efficiency of th Society office and improve the ability of the office to serve its membership. Agenda and minutes of meetings are posted, and all meetings are open to the general membership. Should the lines of communication break down be- tween elected representatives and their constituents break down, stu- dents are welcome, indeed en- couraged, to speak to the executive or staff about issues of concern. The Students’ Society Equipment Purchase Committee: Rose Grassman Merrylyn Houlihan Christina Steinmann ‘o Jennifer Whiteside jo “crunch. Lots of students, and not enough computers. Only 2 com- puter labs (PC) between CIS and OADM. This caused a lot of stress at final project time. Then came a drastic change. The CIS and OADM departments both got new labs. Both of them loaded with the latest technology (286), the latest versions of software. It is a relief to see Douglas college keeping up with technology. It gives Douglas stu- dents an edge; in this world, an edge can make a difference. As for me, I am heading to SFU. Hey I need an edge too. The diploma is a good thing to have, but I want more. I just hope Douglas continues to keep up with the pace of technology. If not, Douglas stu- dents could lose their edge, and possibly the chance at a decent job. Colin Turkington Soon to be x-CIS student Dogs! "Oh great", I said to my friend as we pulled into the drive way. "“Dobermans." I don’t know what it is but dogs, especially big dogs, get me apprehensive. Of course, the ap- prehensiveness builds to a fever pitch when I see these animals bounding around, barking loudly, and displaying no signs of effective visible restraint. "Just don’t show any fear and they won’t bother you." Somehow I knew that classic cliche on canine behavior was in- evitable, and if there is one cliche I hate, it is one that has never been effictive for me personally. Anyways, after two hours of terror the beasts had subsided, and once within the safe confines of an automobile, I began to think about dogs. Not any one dog, but just the species in general. I suppose sometime, long ago, wolves started to get an idea. Who knows, maybe the Emperor or someone said to a congress of gathered wolf leaders, "Hey, if we help instead of hinder these crazy, furless creatures who use only two legs, we will get guaranteed food and warmth. Our scouting parties have proven it. They never come back." So, consequently, over time wolves became domesticated and assumed a new identity: DOGS! This, of course, all seems very ob- vious, but how come there is only one kind of wolf, geographic names aside, and so many different \day, Novemeber 6, 1989 types of dogs? Tough question? No, not really. The explana- tion is simple when taken in his- toric terms. After domestication dogs not only had to adapt to work- ing and living under certain geographical conditions, they, like their human masters, had to adopt nationalities. Ludicrous, you say? Un- founded?! Hogwash?! Well, I suppose a few specific examples must be examined to “stem the voices of cynics. First, the German Shepherd. Physically, the breed is perfectly suited to Ger- many, from the plains of Prussia continued onpage7