oa LINTON Twelve degrees of separation il By Ronald Callender as the oath-of-office snafu, wherein Chief Justice John Roberts stumbled over some wording while President Obama was being sworn in as the 44th president of the U.S., a blessing in disguise? Was poetic justice at work when the snafu occurred? The snafu has been a blessing in disguise, at least for me and will be for anyone who has an interest in U.S. politics. If it hadn’t occurred, I would not have looked into the ways President Obama’s circumstances and actions have separated him from his predecessor, George W. Bush. Within hours of ascending to the U.S. presidency, Obama signed executive orders to create the highest ethical standards for any administration. His predecessor’s administration was ethically challenged. President Obama’s executive orders dealing with issues surrounding the military prison at Guantanamo Bay (“Gitmo”), and its prisoners are diametrically opposite to Bush policies on the same matters, and will close the military prison at the U.S.’s Cuban naval station within one year; establish an interagency task force to deal with what should be done with the approximately 245 prisoners at “Gitmo;” restore the standard and due process for the U.S. military court-martial system; and end torture, including water boarding, which was conducted to get intelligence from prisoners in U.S. military custody. Bush’s policies were generally described as not good for US. citizens or the U.S. standing in the world. 8 Therefore, their undoing means the snafu was pregnant with poetic justice. The snafu also propelled President Obama from just being one of 42 presidents into a special small-group of presidents. That distances him again from Bush. Bush was never sworn in twice in one term. But President Obama, by retaking the oath “out of an abundance of caution,” became only the third U.S. president to do so in one term. Chester Alan Arthur, the 21st President of the U.S., had to retake the oath. Calvin Coolidge was the second U.S. president to take the oath twice in one term. President Obama is the only U.S. president to graduate from Columbia University and to hold a Juris Doctor Law degree magna cum laude; second youngest U.S. president ever elected to the office he holds; one of five U.S. presidents who invited an in-law to live in the White House; the eighth left-handed U.S. president; the first US. president of African descent; and the politician who ascended to the U.S presidency the fastest. The snafu is a good example of how something can appear to be bad for us, but can turn out for our good: without the snafu, President Obama would not be part of the special small group of presidents with a rare experience and he would not have an official funny story to tell his grandchildren about the role of the “strict constructionist’ chief justice in the snafu who was the jurist Bush nominated and he voted against. What-sexual’? The prefixes are coming! By Helen Clay n Tuesday, February 17", Justin and Helen of the Douglas Pride Collective will be hosting an information table for pansexuality and asexuality in the New Westminster campus concourse. No idea what pansexual and asexual means? You’re not the only one! Pansexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by what some pansexuals refer to as “gender blindness.” This means that gender and sex are irrelevant in choosing a partner, either romantic or sexual. The key to understanding pansexuality is to know the difference between sex and gender. Sex is biological, determined by your hormones, your chromosomes and what’s in your pants. Gender is your perception of yourself as masculine or feminine, or in some cases a little of both or perhaps even neither. So one could be of the female sex but have a male gender identity or vice versa. Now how does that relate to pansexuality? Pansexuality means rejecting the idea that only two genders exist, male and female, perhaps even thinking of gender as a spectrum, which we move around all our lives. So a specific gender is not the focus in a sexual or romantic partner or partners. Pansexuality is therefore an attraction to all genders. Can pansexuals be monogamous? The answer is yes. Justin, himself, is in a monogamous relationship at the moment. Of course, some pansexuals opt for non-monogamy, but that is independent of their orientation, as many heterosexuals also opt for non- monogamy. What about asexuality? An asexual is defined as a person who does not experience sexual attraction. So, if asexuals don’t want to have sex with anyone, who cares? Why does anyone else need to know? Well, many asexual people will still experience romantic attraction and fall in love. This gets to be a problem when all the other people around you appear to be sexual, and need to express their love through sex. There’s been little research on asexuality to date. One study suggested that one percent of the population may be asexual—that’s 22,000 people in Metro Vancouver! The problem is that most of these 22,000 people don’t know that asexual is a valid orientation, and that they are not the only ones who feel this way. They may be in a relationship, very much in love with their partner, but suffering stress over the issue of sex. Or, perhaps they have never felt the need for a close relationship, and feel isolated from the rest of society. Many asexuals find understanding and like-minded people on the web forum www.asexuality.org. So come along on Tuesday, February 17", and check out our table in the concourse of the New Westminster campus. We’ll have lots of info on pansexuality and asexuality, and Justin and Helen will be there to answer any questions you may have. If you’re not in school that day, come find us in the Pride Office, located in the New Westminster Students’ Union Building (room 328). The general office hours are posted around campus. Justin’s hours are 12-2 p.m. Mondays and 10:30 a.m.—2:30 p.m. Thursdays. Helen is in on Mondays 2 p.m— p.m. Justin and Helen from the Douglas Pride Collective