— wm Knowlton Thomas because its use had diminished, and the penny became the smallest denomination of currency in the United States. 150 years later, North American government and economists are wondering if it is now time to retire the penny. There are many valid reasons why the penny shouldn’t retire, however. In abolishing the penny, prices for goods would have to be rounded up or down—and you can bet safely that you’re going to see more ups and downs. The penny’s vanishing act, then, would trigger a small wave of inflation. Research suggests that inflation would create $600 million of extra spending over a year, although if you take America’s population of over 300 million, that’s less than $2 per person. Still, sudden inflation would also likely cause the government to spend [: 1857, the American halfpenny was abolished 12 TMU Ley . wit classic copper coin has become a nuisance. SIM Le em ae em MOREL Mate oe more money. An economics professor at Penn State University estimates that abolishing the penny would result in $1 billion more in government spending over a five-year period because payments from many government programs are linked to inflation in both Canada and the U.S. Furthermore, no penny would likely mean more nickels. While the penny costs nearly two When somebody drops a penny, they often don’t bother to pick it up—the time and effort isn’t worth regaining possession of the coin. It may even be a while before somebody else decides to pick up. It isn’t a lucky penny anymore, as the old adage goes, but rather dead weight and a nuisance when you’re looking for other coins in your pocket or purse. cents to produce, as revealed from the Obama administration’s recent budget, a nickel costs nearly a dime. While both cost twice their worth to produce, the nickel costs significantly more overall, and increased nickel production would not serve to reduce costs in making small change for North Americans (Yes, a penny saved is worth two pennies melted, but you’re not the first to think of it, and no, it’s not legal). So there are a few potential downsides. Still, the negative connotations with abolishing a penny are, rather inarguably, outdated. North America is lagging behind the times. Australia removed its one- and two-cent coins in the early ‘90s. So did New Zealand—in fact, they even demonetized their five-cent piece. The United Kingdom gave up their farthing, a quarter penny, and their halfpenny once they became redundant. In the 13" century, a farthing could buy an entire chicken. By the 1950s, just before it was demonetized, the coin could be exchanged for a single gumball. At best. This sort of dramatic reduction in value is no different with the cases of the Canadian and American pennies. With the Canadian and American pennies equally as useless, and with many other leading countries dropping their smallest coins, it makes sense for us to abolish the penny and consider the nickel soon after. Inflation has eaten away at the penny for decades and rendered insignificant. According to a Royal Canadian Mint survey released in October 2007, 42 per cent of consumers would support abolishing the penny, with only 33