news // no. 4 Annual rent increase percentage released for 2019 » Still no word on the rent rebate promised by NDP government Katie Czenczek News Editor f youre currently a tenant, you are not going to like this. On September 8—a Friday, the weekly dumping day of political bad news—the BC government announced that next year’s allowable rent increase will be 4.5 percent, making this the highest increase since 2004. In order for this raise to come into effect, landlords must give their tenants a full three months’ notice prior to asking for more money. According to the Ministry of Housing’s website, rent has gone up more than 30 percent in the last 10 years. With the current increase alone, it will bean 8.5 percent jump in two years. The BC government set up a Rental Housing Task Force led by Spencer Chandra Herbert, MLA in the West End, in April of this year. The task force was in charge of consulting tenants, landlords, and tenancy advocacy centres all across the province to come up witha recommendation for renting legislation. Andrew Sakamoto, the Executive Director of the Tenant Resource & Advisory Centre (TRAC), said in a phone interview with the Other Press that the change will be difficult for many tenants to swing. “T think that it’s going to be a struggle for a lot of tenants, to be honest,” he said. “Rent increases are far outpacing wage increases for many tenants. Too many tenants across the province are paying an unhealthy amount of money on rent.” The average cost for a two-bedroom home in Vancouver is $1,552 per month, according to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s 2017 report. If landlords choose to raise rent in 2019, the total rent would go up by $69.84, making the average monthly rent $1621.84. TRAC was one of the advocacy groups consulted by the Task Force in early July. Sakamoto said that they recommended a temporary rent freeze, along with cutting the guaranteed two percent landlords get on top of inflation. “Every year, landlords are allowed to raise rent a certain amount, but it’s not only based on inflation,” he said. “They also get a guaranteed two percent increase theotherpress.ca PREVIOUS MAXIMUM RENT INCREASES So Maximum allowable rent increase each year. What we proposed was first off, a temporary rent freeze for three years, to be followed by an amendment of the rent increase formula to eliminate that two percent that landlords get each year.” The reason TRAC recommended a temporary rent freeze was to counteract the loophole landlords took advantage of in previous years. Previously, landlords could get around yearly caps by signing six- month contracts with vacate clauses, said Sakamoto. “What [vacate clauses] allowed landlords to do is that after six months, they could kick out that tenant, bring someone new in, and jack up the rent to whatever they wanted,” he said. “Or, they could go to that existing tenant, give them the option to stay in the rental unit, but they would have to sign a new 2013 2012 2 3 re oOo ff @ FF seseesée eye SS NS PY a PS Chart via Province of British Columbia contact with new terms, with rent at any amount. That led to rentals all across the province to be artificially inflated. It was a way to circumvent the rent control in the Residential Tenancy Act? Although Sakamoto was disappointed in the announcement for 2019, he said that there’s still hope for legislation to address the rental housing crisis. “We're very pleased that the government mostly closed that loophole now, but we're still feeling the effects of that. Despite all of the disappointment around this 4.5 rental increase among tenants, we're still hopeful that this task force will lead to positive change in the area of tenancies. But in terms of protecting tenants in general—next year.” Doug Ford infringing on the ‘Rights and Freedoms’ of Ontarians » The debate over Ontario Premier’s plans enters a new round Naomi Ambrose Contributor he battle between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Superior Court Justice Edward Belobaba has intensified. Superior Court Justice Belobaba ruled that Ford’s plan to reduce the current 47 wards in Toronto to 25 wards—a plan that is more formally known as Bill 5 or The Better Local Government Act—infringes upon the “freedom of expression” aspect of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for voters and candidates. This infringement is pertinent—especially considering the fact that the act emerges in the middle of Toronto's election campaign. The city’s vote is scheduled for October 22 this year. Ina document obtained via the Ontario Superior Court of Justice website, Judge Belobaba stated that the Act “substantially interfered with both the candidate’s and the voter’s right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.’ Belobaba said that a drastic reduction of the number of wards reduces fair representation for the large number of voters in Toronto. With regards to the candidates’ infringement of their freedom of expression, Judge Belobaba wrote that “candidates spent more time on doorsteps addressing the confusing state of affairs with potential voters than discussing relevant political issues. The candidates’ efforts to convey their political message about the issues in their particular ward were severely frustrated and disrupted.” Judge Belobaba also elaborated about this unprecedented situation. “Never before has a Canadian government meddled with democracy like the Province of Ontario did when, without notice, it fundamentally altered the City of Toronto’s governance structure in the middle of the City’s election,” he wrote. Ina press release from the Office of the Ontario Premier, Ford announced that his government will immediately appeal Judge Belobaba’s decision to the Ontario Court of Appeal. “T believe this decision is deeply concerning and wrong,” said Ford. In addition to the appeal, several news reports have stated that Ford intends to use the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to disregard the Judge's decision. The notwithstanding clause allows the government to make laws that violate the Charter. Ford’s reported decision to invoke the notwithstanding clause has been met with fierce opposition. In a press release issued by the Ontario NDP, Andrea Horwath, the Leader of the Official Opposition, called Ford’s plan to “invoke the notwithstanding clause and suspend part of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for cC Ontarians an unprecedented abuse of power.” Photo of Doug Ford via Wikimedia Commons Never before has a Canadian government meddled with democracy like the Province of Ontario did...” Superior Court Justice Edward Belobaba