‘ framework was accepted by the | college board and that he is em- Monday, April 18, 1988 the Other Press by Aeriol Alderking Faculty has cut off communica- tions with administration according | to Len Millis, president of the | DKFA. eo Annoyed by amemo sent to ’all | excluded employees’ by Ross Cameron; David Reynolds, Staff : Representative, wrote a letter to Cameron outlining his objections. In his letter, Reynolds claims that Cameron referred to the tenta- tive framework discussed at media- ' tionasa "faculty proposal’. He also | claimed that Cameron informed him that the College Board had |. Tejected the framework. Reynolds also states that the faculty salary proposal remains the same as tabled January 26, 1988. -.-Cameron says that the powered to make decisions based on language.He is limited by aman- date concerning the total dollar valule of the package. According to Cameron, after a framework had been agreed upon, | the mediation talks turned to | money. He says he stated from the | start,” I cannot talk about money if the cost to the college will be in- _ creased above our last offer. | am _ prepared to commit to taking back F any wage proposal to the board for , their considerations without any | recommendation from the college negotiating team." He says this statement was reiterated on several occasions. Cameron says the framework was not rejected and that good progress was made on the language issues. He says the salary offer on the table is better than any in the province except one. Reynolds says, "It appears to the DKFA that you are attempting to characterize a neutral recommen- dation as a proposal from one side, and thereby attempting to gain some political advantage.” Cameron plans to respond in writ- ing by Monday. In the meantime, the DKFA has decided to respond by no longer agreeing to the deletion of article 1:06. The DKFA still intends to withhold students grades from ad- ministration. Millis says that they may issue students a letter informing them of their grades. However, SFU has said they won’t accept any letters and UBC has not responded. Millis says the goal is to get a collective agreement although it may reveal inadequacies in the ‘government managing of the col- lege in the process. Faculty meet Tuesday to discuss by what mechanism they could make stu- dents marks available to them. Day Loses Cool The AGM held by the DCSS held some unexpected surprises. | The motion to donate $10,000. to the Douglas College Foundation | was defeated when three DCSS ex- ecutive spoke against the motion. Bill Day reportedly, called Marilyn Hoolihan and yelled, “What the hell is going on down | there--I feel like I just got a bag of shit smashed in my face!" Day demanded a meeting with the DCSS executive to explain their ac- ~ tions regarding the Foundation. At the meeting, Day said that | there had been a steady pattern of_ behaviour from the DCSS even though their requests for high level | political participation on the | Foundation’s board were treated with great respect. "If the executive _ or senate of the DCSS believe the Foundation and what it stands for is | not worthy of support, that is their right, but the president and the Foundation had a right to know. Shane Pollack said that the senate had passed a policy to the ef- fect that no donations would come from the capital funds. The funds | would have to be raised. Anena Johnston said,"I think the | student society has always been cooperative and that the Founda- | tion being “not worthy’ was com- pletely incorrect.” She said that the senates concern was to provide stu- dents with services not provided by the college and direct financial sup- port should not come from their small levy. Rick Shepherd said he definitely supports the Foundation and that he and Julian Smit had been investigat- ing various fundraising pos- sibilities. Both Randi Duke and Bill Day said that they could understand if the DCSS was having financial problems. Duke wondered why Pol- lack had not mentioned this at any of their board meetings and re- quested that he make a full report on the DCSS financial situation at the next meeting on the 27th. Duke also requested that the financial status of the DCSS be published in the Other Press. She believes that open com- munication can only enhance the society’s public image. Duke thinks that students should know what the DCSS’ vision for student aid is and " together we can do something very positive here.” ‘At the AGM, Pollack stated that students donating money being rewarded back to them was just creating a big circle. Shepherd had been trying to use the donation as a bargaining tool for leverage in establishing a pub. See Cool on page 2 Students en JOY lighter moment of entertainment in the concourse Volume XXIV_ Issue XI OP Vandalized by Aeriol Alderking On Friday, the Other Press lounge area was vandalized. The phone cover was broken into several pieces and two boxes of used chemicals had been slashed, leaking rank-smelling fluid onto the floor. A reporter’s notes had been taken from his book and were found in the trash can across the hall. The Other Publication Society’s board has now closed the lounge area to students. They Happenings In Space or Is It ? by Aeriol Alderking Like all famous stories begin: Once upon a time, in a land far away, there was a student society gearing up for their annual elec- tions. Yes, it was time, once again, to choose the best candidates for Galactica College Student Society. There was a great commotion caused when one of the candidates posted his banner, only twelve feet long, over the exit doors, taking great care not to cover the exit sign. The CRO (Chief Returning Officer) disqualified the candidate, but he quickly reappeared running for another executive position. The all-candidates meeting went well, with a few candidates fielding a flurry of questions regarding their ethics. Many lies were told but no one seemed to mind and the remainder of the elections was un- eventful. Alas, a reporter for the Galactic Tribune, recieved an interesting call that was to interrupt these peaceful events. A student had been promised a paid position in return for her influence in favor of one of the candidates. Wondering what the appropriate action would be, the reporter went to see the society’s secretary, who was most knowledgable in constitutional and legal affairs. The secretary said that the can- didate would probably be dis- qualified by the CRO. However, elections were over and it didn’t matter now. "What if the candidate was elected?” asked the reporter. The secretary said that she should call the CRO and supplied his cor- rect name and phone number. The reporter phoned the CRO. He didn’t know if he could do any- thing about it and said he needed a signed statement from the student. So, the reporter met with the student and took her statement which the student then edited, initialled, and signed along with the reporter and an unbiased witness. The student said that this can- didate had asked her to run for vice president with her and that she had replied "only if the position paid". The reporter knew this to be true as she was present during this conver- sation. Apparently after the reporter’s departure the conversa- tion addressed the money issue more seriously. Months prior to the election this student had approached the presi- dent about a position she was creat- ing. The president asked her about herself and her affiliations as the job was that of student liason.Now, the president’s protegee was believed to be saying that if she was elected she would do everything in her power to create this position and that she thought this student would be a good candidate for the job. Of course, she would have to discuss the amount of pay available with the current president and the senate. "I was flattered and interested in the position...Also during this time she asked me if I was interested in doing the newsletter as a part of the student liason position. I said, *Sure’." So, the students basic un- derstanding was that " if I helped her run for president and that she was elected, that there was a good chance that the position of student liason would probably be made available to me specifically as a paid position.” The student helped edit her cam- paign speech, handed out leaflets, and told friends to vote for this can- didate. In the student’s opinion, she was in a position to effect the out- come of the election because she has affiliations with certain centers in the college. "I am well-respected and trusted by my peers and I feel many took my advice". The night of the elections , the student received a call from her can- ae : didate who was triumphant and said that they would meet in the next few days. They never met and the new president-elect did not return her calls. When she was reached, the president-elect made non-commit- tal statements, saying she would have to talk to the current president; the student felt that " she was play- ing games”. In a final attempt to get the mat- ter clarified for herself, she called and demanded an immediate answer.The current president was present at the president-elect’s home and apparently stated, "I didn’t promise you the job, the president-elect did."The president went further to say that she had no power to make the job payable, but if the student wanted, she could run for the position when it came avail- able in the fall."She said there would be a good chance that I’ll get it because no one else was likely to See Space on page 2 percent. Some rea were slower to catch on. The Other Press thanks all tion and warm to enthusiastic April Fools Douglas College students can rest assured that the col- lege will not be moving, nor will student fees be raised 500 In the last issue of the Other Press (April 4, 1988), two stories entitled “New Campus for College” and “More fee hikes” were run as part of an “April Fools” edition of the Other Press.Unfortunately, the raffle of the past DCSS ex- ecutive, planned for the AGM, never took place either. This may be due to quorum being called for. The response to our April Fools articles were varied. cee immediately spotted the joke while others helped make April Fools a success! its readers for their partici a- responses to the articles. You