-—_ War of the Words The Olympics are necessary > Olympic games encourage unity and multiculturalism Jerrison Oracion Senior Columnist he 2018 Pyeongchang Winter Olympic Games are happening now, and Canada has won a lot of medals earlier than expected. The Olympic games are something that happens every four years, where the entire world is watching and cheering on their team to get medals for their countries. The Olympics show that when everyone comes and plays together, the world can be united by the power of sport. The Olympics have a lot of sports to showcase, providing a lot of choices on which events you can watch. When watching them, you might become interested in a sport or learn about a sport that you did not know about. You even could be inspired to compete in that sport and participate in a future Olympic Games. There are many benefits to having an Olympics. The Olympic games unite people and promote multiculturalism. In the host city of an Olympic Games, everyone shows their colours, supports their country’s team, and go to events and activities together. It boosts tourism in whatever city it’s being hosted in, and essentially puts it on the map. Also, it encourages people to volunteer in the games to get more involved in the world community and make a difference. Since the entire world is watching the games, there are a lot of moments that people will talk about for a long time, and the Olympics also teaches viewers things about sports they may not have known before. An example of this in the Winter Games this year are the snowboard commentators, including recent Canadian bronze medalist snowboarder Mark McMorris’s brother, Craig McMorris, using snowboarding slang to describe what was happening, which helped people learn snowboarding terms. An example of a moment that people will talk about is the North Korean Cheer Team that is seen in various venues. While some say their cheers might contain propaganda, the combination with pop music makes them interesting. The Olympics are necessary because it encourages everyone to do sports and unites countries and people. Everyone talks about the Olympics when they are on, which brings people together and helps to diffuse world conflicts. The Winter Games seem to have calmed the situation with North Korea somewhat because the South Korean athletes are getting along with the North Korean athletes, Kim Jong-Un’s sister went to the opening ceremony, and it has facilitated discussions with South Korean President Moon Jae-In. If the Olympics were not happening, countries would be further divided, and things might have been much worse. v (¥ Justice goes both ways (¥ High school reunions in the age of social media And more! Why the Gerald Stanley acquittal carries such weight yy Py d Yes & e The Olympics are unnecessary > Olympic games are a waste of time and money Jessica Berget Opinions Editor t’s the second week of the Olympics being aired on almost every television screen in the world, which means it’s the second week of me avoiding television at all costs. As someone who does not care for either sports entertainment, nationalism, or any variation of the two, the Olympic games represent the worst of both worlds. Tie that in with all the billions of dollars that are spent on the games and the negative social and economic effects that come with hosting an Olympic game, and what you have is one huge, unnecessary mess. It’s not the sports aspect that I have any quarrels with; rather, it’s the relentless coverage, wasteful nature, and the whole pizzazz of the games themselves. Billions of dollars and many resources are wasted every time the Olympics take place every two years, billions of dollars that can and should have been used in many other ways that could benefit the country and its people. Massive and expensive structures that are built fora momentary event such as the Olympics are often left abandoned and eventually decayed, and countries that struggle with poverty get flushed down the economic toilet after opting to host the Olympic games. We saw this when Athens hosted the Olympics in 2004 and went into recession 10 years after, with many people noting that the 2004 games were the starting point for the decline. A similar thing happened in the 1976 Montreal Winter Olympics. A lot of construction was needed before the games started, but most of it wasn’t finished in time, a mistake that cost the city $1.2 billion and severely crippled their financial security for almost 30 years. Even worse was in Beijing in 2008, where they spent $42 billion on the games and 1.5 million people were displaced from their homes to make room to build the Olympic structures—structures that have since been abandoned. Many countries leap at the chance to host an Olympic game in their major cities, but it comes with a heavy price-tag and limited benefits, which makes me question whether it’s necessary to have an Olympics at all. I can appreciate the drama and excitement of the Olympics; of wanting to be the country with the most gold medals, or holding the most impressive world records, but I hardly see the point in building structures that will never be used again or wasting money on an event that only serves as temporary entertainment. To me, the Olympics are fun and entertaining in the short-term, but serve little to no long-term purpose. Photo by Richard Heathcote via Getty Images