March 26, 2003 Professors for Peace Band Together Black ribbon campaign part of effort to allay apathy ae News the other press http://otherpress.douglas.bc.ca Phil Koch - Gradzette WINNIPEG (CUP)—A group of female pro- fessors at the University of Manitoba, clad in black armbands, are taking aim at campus apa- thy while responding to world events. Jila Gomeshi, a professor in the Department of Linguistics, founded the loosely-knit group Professors for Peace. With no over-arching phi- losophy and no mission statement, Gomeshi says it’s simply a group of women who do the same job and share the same feeling of frustra- tion. In fact, according to Gomeshi, it’s somewhat unusual for them to have come together in this way at all. “Tm not a joiner,” she said. “I don’t like groups.” Nevertheless, she maintains that it’s important for her at this time to know there are other people who share her concerns about world events. What brought the group together was oppo- sition to an invasion of Iraq—that and an invi- tation sent from labour studies department head Julie Guard to approximately 40 female academics. Guard asked them to attend an informal meeting at her house early in February, and she encouraged them to invite other interested women. “That's where I actually met some female col- leagues for the first time,” Gomeshi noted. “It’s an amazing thing that we rarely have an oppor- tunity to meet people from other depart- ments.” Joanne Valin, a PhD student in English, became involved when her academic supervisor mentioned the afternoon meeting. “She knew my frustration and that I was feeling very iso- lated because there isn’t any visible anti-war movement on campus with the students,” Valin said. Valin is pleased to see professors taking a stance, and possibly risking isolation, in order to engage the university community. “This is especially important on a campus like ours where there is an apathetic feeling that pervades the student space,” she noted. The group wants to make use of the degree of influence their positions entail. “If we have very strong opinions about some- thing that’s going on in the world, are we allowed to share those opinions?” Gomeshi asks. “And in what way is it acceptable to do so?” Gomeshi and her colleagues recognize that they are in positions of power with respect to their students, and they do not want to abuse that. So rather than making speeches to their classes, which some group members feel would be inappropriate, they chose to wear black-rib- bon armbands. This is something Gomeshi finds difficult, in part because of people's tendency to make assumptions. “The way this is playing out as a black-and- white issue—that you're either with us or you're with the terrorists—makes it very difficult to ‘wear something like the black armband,” she Queer Forum Condemns Cuts Panel aims to make pride political Jodi Garwood The Peak said. “It makes me feel vulnerable and. visib because there are certain kinds of implicatio that are not valid—like, ‘if you are against t war, then you hate the US,’ or, ‘if you are an war, then you condone the events of Septemb Vin Was While she feels uncomfortable with t assumptions some people may make, Gomes feels she must wear the armband. “If everybo is afraid to voice their opinion, then the pr war people have won.” Gomeshi observes that Canadians are in ge eral quite modest. Rather than reacting stron ly to their feelings, she says, Canadians are a to think they don’t know enough to have position. “If we do nothing else, we're demonstrati that it’s okay to have an opinion.” Gomes says the group wants people to know that y don't need to be an expert to take a positi about something like war. Valin also finds it sometimes difficult to we the black ribbon. “I am constantly reminded the isolation factor,” she said. “When you we something like that and you look around t room, you remember that other people are wearing it.” Yet the group isn’t looking to dramatical expand its membership. To the contrar Gomeshi says they are trying to help by pr viding a model for others. “We'd like to inspi people to form their own groups.” BURNABY, BC (CUP)—Poor turnout for a forum on BC Liberal cuts affecting the queer community took some of the attention away from the provincial gov- ernment’ human rights mandate and focused the spotlight on the queer com- munity itself. Organized by Queers United Against Kapitalism (QUAK), the forum featured a speakers’ panel that included queer youth advocate Victoria Henry, Blain Butyniec of the Anti-Poverty Committee, past Human Rights Commissioner Mary-Woo Sims, and transgender/transsexual rights advocate Lukkas Maitland. QUAK is accusing the provincial gov- ernment of attacking the queer communi- ty through the elimination of the Human Rights Commission, cuts to health care for people with HIV/AIDS, slashing of queer youth support programs, cuts to health care for transgendered/transsexu- als, and the reworking and privatization of social services. The panel took aim at openly gay BC Liberal MLA Lorne Mayencourt for his role in the cuts, arguing that he has failed to stand up for the interests of the com- munity he claims to represent. “Mayencourt has supported every one of his government's attacks on the queer community,” said forum facilitator Mary- Woo Sims. “He has done nothing for us in this fight.” When asked to comment on QUAK’s claims, Mayencourt’s office replied that he was unavailable. The turnout, which totaled just over a dozen people by the end of the two-hour forum, was disappointing but not surpris- ing for some of the speakers. “This is indicative of the problems of organizing within the queer community and trying to mobilize a queer response to the cuts,” said Butyniec. “It’s definitely an ongoing problem.” For Butyniec, it seems that many in the queer community don’t want to rock the boat and will accept what little, if any, representation they can get in mainstream society. “Lorne Mayencourt is a perfect example of someone who is queer and doing a lot of harm to this community, but we aren't supposed to question it, for the very fact that he is queer,” Butyniec said. “Gay equals good a lot of times in this commu- nity and that’s something QUAK definite- ly wants to challenge.” According to QUAK, one of the reasons for forming the organization was to repre- sent those that are often ignored or out- cast by their own community. “We are a space that honours the voices of those queers who are silenced by the main- stream capitalist gay and lesbian commu- nity: queers of colour, trannies, First Nations, disabled, sex trade workers, poor and working class,” reads a QUAK infor- mation pamphlet. “We challenge the notion that queer liberation is achieved simply through gay politicians, their police forces or by mimicking the straig status quo.” “The phrase ‘queer community’ thrown around a lot,” said Butynie “More and more when we talk about t queer community it means white, means male, it means able-bodied and means upper-class.” “We see this reflected in our represent tions, whether through corporate medi and shows like Will & Grace, or withi our own community media, such as Xi West, or our supposed queer leaders suc as Lorne Mayencourt.” However, Mary-Woo Sims wanted make it clear that despite a lack of uni and mobilization, the forum was not ju: about airing the dirty laundry of the que community. “It’s not a bitching session, it’s about fi uring out how to fight back, it’s about su viving, and it’s about forming a resis ance.” © page 4