Sac by Warren Laine ~ The threat of nuclear war, and the total destruction of human civilization, has loomed over our heads for the past 35 years. Stockpiles of nuclear weapons have grown and become more and more advanced since the Cold War years, when everyone was worried about someone dropping the ‘Big One’. Today people have turned into apathetic ostriches; not willing to dwell on a nuclear wars’ implications. After all, the impli- cations are immense, as well as very taxing on the imagination; and the ‘Big One’ can now wipe out the human race more than 25 times over. The notion that a nuclear war is survivable, or that civil defense is plausible, raises some interesting questions. What would warn us in the event of a nuclear attack? charge? To warn the public of an oncoming attack, air raid sirens are the universal standby, but since 1968 there has been a national ban on audibly testing these sirens. This means that Vancouver’s 56 sirens, made a- round 1950, haven‘t been tested in 13 years. Bob MacDonald, Fire Chief for North Vancouver, was interested in using the sirens for peace-time emergencies. It took the city six months to obtain permission from the minister of national defense, and a promise to alert the public about the intended test; so as to not panic the city. On June 20 of last year the sirens went off. Far from panicking the public, only 60 per cent of the people heard the sirens and none knew what they signified. The reason for this seems to be that the municipality has expanded too far for the sirens to reach and that since the 1950s, buildings have been put up around the sirens, thereby blocking them. If this is so, they could not warn us in the event of an attack! The idea that Vancouver will be a target is acknowledged by most experts; if not in the first strike, then in the second or third. (Vancouver is the largest port apart from San Fransisco and is a communications, governmental center.) To give a scenario of a possible attack, let’s say a one megaton bemb was detonated 8000 feet over City Hall. What would (happen? A one megaton bomb is Where would we go if we were. attacked? Who would be in BRITISH . COLUMBIA aay _comforts of home: your own air -popular. In Peking, the entire be found and we may never know due to the federal-ban on’ place } industrial, and equal to one million tons of TNT. The bombs used on Hiroshima and - Nagasaki were equal to only 15000 tons of TNT. Remember photos of the cities after only one of those bombs?; Imagine 6 times that destruction to picture what Vancouver would look like. 5 if a one megaton bomb was dropped on Vancouver, the city would be obliterated, a flash fire would result, and the pressure from the blast would put 5 pounds “per square inch of over-pressure on all the buildings; this means that anything standing would be flattened, and anyone caught out in the open would be instantly vaporized. According to Dr. Karl Erdman, a physicist at UBC, “There are no survival possibil- ities.‘ Outside of Vancouver, the fall- out would spread as far north as Williams Lake. High tempera- tures and poisonous gases would turn any shelter into an oven or a gas chamber. According. to Dr. Thomas Perry, physicist at UBC, it would be worse than the Black PLAGUE: ‘‘There is no possible medical. response to a nuclear attack.’ He calculates that in Vancouver, 400000 people would killed outright, with 300000 people dying within 4 weeks from radia- tion. 70 per cent of the doctors and nurses in Vancouver would also be killed, and all the hospitals would be destroyed. There would also be no water, electricity, or medical supplies. In a nuclear war, about 20000 survivors would be burn victims in Vancouver alone. In all of North America, there are only 2000 beds available for burn victims; and that is during peace-time. ‘‘If the powers used only one-quarter of their weapons, there would only be about 6-7 million survivors in Canada, maybe 66 million in all of North America; we must be in- formed that a nuclear war is NOT survivable,’’ says Perry. If you wish to flee the city towards the interior, try to picture. the rest of the Vancouver area doing the same thing. Evacuating Vancouver is refered to as being between ‘exceedingly difficult’ and ‘absolutly impossible’. Fred D. Cooper, B.C. represen- tative of Emergency Planning Can- ada (E.P.C.), is not at all optimis- tic about civil defense. ‘‘It is the government’s responsibility to pro- vide the country with a civil defense program, but it is naive to think that they possibly could,’’ said Cooper. ‘’The government is doing little because there is no way to protect the country, it can’t be done!‘’ There is literature available from the E.P.C. such as ‘Your Basement Shelter’, with a » them, and few would be out there pS... toreward by ‘ YOUR Prime Mini- ster’, the late John Diefenbaker. There is also, ‘Eleven Steps to Survival’ (c. 1950), about how to construct a shelter from old mat- tresses and doors. Today shelters are a lucrative business. Costing 50000 dollars, they are equipped with 30 days. supplies and all the filter system, radiation monitor, sewage, and beds; unfortunately they are only effective against fallout. Says Greg Cooper, a bomb shelter ‘builder, ‘‘North America has never been bombed or felt the ravages of modern warfare, we are surrounded by a false sense of security...In Switzerland and the rest of Europe shelters are very underground is one massive maze of tunnels; the entire population can be underground in seven minutes,’’ says Cooper. Fred Cooper says there is: more shelter space in Canada than there are people; you just have to find it. Cooper did not say where this abundant shelter could signs on these shelters. Another problem with shelters is that if the EPC were to begin issuing instruc- tions regarding shelter locations and survival tips, it could provoke a war in itself. The Soviet Union monitors North American com- munications 24 hours a day. If the Russians picked up these instruc- tions about shelters, they may consider it a hint that the Ameri- cans were about to attack; if this happened they would let fly with everything they have. In Nanaimo, there is a shelter in which a core of 300 governmental representatives would go during an attack. After which they would give instructions from this bunker, | as well as try to keep law and order. This idea is naive in that no one would be willing to obey patrolling, making sure this law and order is implemented. Be- sides, thre won’t be any society left to try to control; and the bunker itself will not withstand a nuclear blast. In Vancouver, along with a lot of the world’s populace, there is an apathetic outlook towards nuclear war. In answer to the question, ‘‘Are you ready for a nuclear war?’’, one Vancouverite respond- ed, ‘‘Ready? How?’’, and then he laughed. “Mother do you think they’ll drop the bomb?’’ -from Pink Floyd’s ‘The Wall’ o