INSIDE DOUGLAS COLLEGE / APRIL 3, 1990 but only one from each group will be turned in for grading. That one copy must have on it the names of all persons on the team. The same score will be given to all members. [It should be pointed out that students may choose to take the examination alone. This, in fact, has happened, but for differing reasons. In one case, the student felt as though he hadn’t prepared well enough and did not want to let the other members of the team down. In another case, the team did not have time to get together prior to test time and did not feel that it would be fair to team-test. Morals? Scruples? You bet!] The results? No cheating—not even an attempt. Why would you cheat when all you have to do is ask another member of the team what he or she thinks? Leadership comes forth. The democratic process sets in. Arbitration and decision-making run amuck. Consensus abounds. Problem solving is seen in its best light. The team members assume more responsibility for the material and are willing to “instruct” other members: in other words, teamwork. We have not discovered any type of test item that cannot be used ona team test. Average time spent on testing increases—students spend more time and make fewer careless errors. When tests are returned and results are known, students are not willing to accept at face value the incorrect answers. They have reasons (sometimes very good reasons) for answering questions in a certain manner. They want to explain their reasoning, and they want to understand why these reasons are incor- rect. They take ownership of the material and become involved with it to the end. This allows re-teaching to take place when the students are the most receptive to it. We have found that the process spills over to other coursework in our department and to other depart- ments, as well. For example, this semester there is a group that meets every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday morning at 7:00 a.m. They have breakfast together and review for a variety of classes, depending upon the group’s needs for the day. The courses for which they prepare together include subjects outside business management where team-testing is not used. They have discovered the benefit of teamwork. But the best result is that student understanding and comprehension improve; on the average, the test results increase from 20 to 22 percent! The best side effects are that the students find out for themselves that teamwork pays off, that every member of the team must contribute to the effort, that the chances of beating the odds go up, that camaraderie has a definite place in the educational system, and that studying isn’t so bad when you have someone to suffer with. What's next? We don’t know for sure, but we’re toying with the idea of team-projects—i.e., research papers, case studies, etc. We're also looking at a team- oriented approach to redesigning the structure of entire classes, maybe even the Business Management pro- gram. Who knows? We may be onto something big here. But, all in all, we feel relatively sure that our business community will look at us from a different perspective once the word gets out. Julia Briggs, Instructor, Business Management Program Thomas O. Harris, Instructor, Business Management Program For further information, contact the authors at Depart- ment of Business Technology, St. Philip’s College, 2111 Nevada, San Antonio, TX 78203. Celebrate! NISOD invites you to its twelfth annual Interna- tlonal Conference on Teaching Excellence and Conference of Administrators, to be held in Austin on May 20-23, 1990. Major keynote speakers have been selected for the broad range of experiences that they will bring to our participants. They include: @ K. Patricia Cross, Professor, University of California at Berkeley, California @ Ronald J. Horvath, President, Jefferson Com- munity College, Kentucky @ Robert H. McCabe, President, Miami-Dade Community College, Florida Special events at the conference will include: Mexican Buffet and Dancing to Texas Fever/ Monday, May 21 @ San Antonio Trip/ Tuesday, May 22 SEE YOU THERE! Suanne D, Roueche, Editor March 2, 1990, Vol. XII, No. 7 ©The University of Texas at Austin, 1990 Further duplication is permitted by MEMBER institutions for their own personnel. INNOVATION ABSTRACTS is a publication of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development (NISOD), EDB 348, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, (512) 471-7545. Subscnptions are available to nonconsor- tium members for $40 per year. Funding in part by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation and the Sid W. Richardson Foundation. Issued weekly when classes are in session during fall and spring terms and once during the summer. ISSN 0199-106X.