© the other press March 3, 2004 Buddha Shakyamuni once told his disciples that there were three thou- sand worlds in a grain of sand. Christians were taught that the human body was a microcosm that looked just like the universe. Daoists _ also believe that the body is like a miniature universe with all the com- ponents and energies of the larger universe. It sounds a little fantastic, but modern physics has discovered that these ancient spiritual teachings are actually very accurate. One of the big turning points in human understanding was when Galileo argued for the Copernican model of the universe. With bril- liant experiments, tricky rhetoric, and politics, he helped to overturn ~ the idea that the universe was a flat In The Pagoda . Extra Dimensions Matthew Little OP Contributor earth with a sun and moon rotating around it,-and a sheet of sparkles surrounding the whole thing. He propelled the idea that the Earth is one among several spherical planets moving around the sun. Later, as we all learned in middle school science, we discovered that everything we see, touch, feel, hear, and taste is actually made of little tiny particles called atoms. Interestingly enough, the structure of an atom is identical to that of a solar system. As technology has advanced, we have been able to ver- ify with greater accuracy that atoms and solar systems do in fact, look a great deal alike. In that case, we might think of a molecule as a miniature galaxy, and atoms like miniature solar systems. In that case, it seams like the old Buddhists, Daoists, and Christians were really onto something. From this understanding, it turns out that the human body and every- thing else around us is composed almost entirely of empty space. If I remember the analogy right, an atoms proton is like a golf ball in the middle of a football stadium and electrons are little peas floating around the back seats. It is like being in the matrix and everything you look at isn’t as it appears. The following is from a website created by the Particle Data Group, which was created to teach kids about science. It provides a way to understand what we're talking about, and how there could be a dimensions. These extra dimensions could be very small, which is why we don’t see them. Think about an acrobat and a flea on a tight rope. The acrobat can move forward and backward along the rope. But the flea can move forward and backward as well as side-to-side. If the flea keeps walking to one side, it goes around the rope and winds up where it started. So the acrobat has one dimension, and the flea has two dimensions, but one of these dimen- sions is a small closed loop. So the acrobat cannot detect any more than the one dimension of the rope, just as we can only see the world in three dimensions, even though it might well have many more. This is impossible to visualize, precisely because we can only visual- ize things in three dimensions! sion. Religions in the west used to teach a person to have faith and to believe in the things that couldn’t be seen. Eastern traditions taught that a person had to be enlightened before they could see, and if they didn’t believe in what they couldn't see, they were said to have poor enlight- enment quality. Remember how they used to talk about angels and demons, spirits and ghosts? Maybe those are just fleas on our tight rope, walking in dimensions we can’t see, and in directions we can't move. Or can we? Why did the ancients believe that human bodies looked just like the universe, or that there were three thousand worlds in a grain of sand? Why did they describe such out- landish-ideas that turned out to be very scientifically accurate? At one time, nearly everyone believed that a human being could possess super- natural skills, and could see and do things that normal people couldn't do with their physical bodies. Could this be true? Could it be that we universe in a grain of sand. “How can there be extra, smaller dimensions? String theory and other new pro- posals require more than three space An acrobat can only move in one dimension along a rope. but a flea can move in two dimensions. could take a step off the tight rope without falling down? We will begin to explore this idea next time.” Maybe we are just like that guy on the tight rope, stuck in our dimen- Re: Living History Brandon Ferguson OP Contributor The Fog of War made me think. There, I said it. The movie, a blend of fiction and fact (isn’t everything these days?), tells the story of Robert Strange McNamara. Robert Strange McNamara in turn is able to tell the story of one of the 20th century's most gruesome eras, that of American participation in war- fare before and during the Cold War. McNamara should know about these things—as a tactician for bombing raids in WWII, it was his number-crunching genius that increased the proportional death count of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians. Then, as the Secretary of Defense for seven years under acronym, JFK and LBJ, he went from being actively in favour of troop withdrawal to being pas- sively in favour of Agent Orange dispersal over the lush jungles of Vietnam. McNamara was in the privileged position to not only wit- ness the brutal realities of war, but to implement them. He had trouble _ recalling whether he personally was the cheque signer for all those Japanese and Vietnamese death certificates though. The Fog of Memory may have been a more apt title. What The Fog of War made me think about was how close we were to a nuclear war. My apologies to the Japanese, who were the victims of the first, and most overlooked, nuclear war. Just as Canada is 1-0 lifetime in head-to-head battles against the US, the US is 1-0 in nuclear wars. Both of these are facts missing from the fictional work that is history. Just as McNamara ripped LBJ for failing to get out of Vietnam, just as McNamara told of General Lemay’s handiwork in carrying out the McNamara-signed incendiary bombing raids—it seems that his- tory is written both by the winners and by those who outlive their opponents. ; But I guess these are birds of the same feather, or rather, dung piles from the same horse’s ass. JFK, and therefore the sub- sidiary McNamara, saved the world (read: the US) from nuclear war in 1962. Fourteen tension filled days that, if they were to hap- pen today, would have been forgot- ten fourteen days later when an intern was caught swallowing, a breast was exposed, a midget Bachelor proposed, or the Gap had a sale. What was I talking about? You and I have both already forgotten. Our shared history is fading away right before our eyes. The Fog of War made me think. That’s it. Robert Strange McNamara could not stress fervently enough how close we came to nuclear anni- hilation. The latent point that he makes, and that I share, is this: it’s a damn good thing JFK was at the helm of the ship to steer the world through such an unpredictable high-stakes game of Risk. Arguably the greatest president of the 20th- century, in easily the strongest nation of the 20th century, JFK was able to avoid pushing that ubiquitous button on one of those fourteen days in 1962. He was a man of such nobility and valour that his legacy still intrigues all. “Today, the third cousin of a sec- ond uncle of the great-grand- daughter of JFK was caught steal- ing Jube Jubes at the local mar- http://www-otherpress.ca ket—story at eleven.” He was a man so good that he therefore must die. John Fitzgerald Kennedy saved us all from the mad Ruskies and his eager military advisors alike. Whew. Thank God we dodged that bullet. But minute...aren’t there still some of those nuclear weapons kicking around? That’s okay—I’m sure we've got people of similar nobility and valour at the helm today. Right? Thousand-year old W, huh? “Today, future former-President George H. Bush’s son (read: future President George W. Bush) was found snorting blow at Yale while drinking and driving, skipping out on National Guard duty—story at eleven.” This is what I thought of at The Fog of War. This was the frighten- ing moral to the story that I took. I turned whiter than the rim of W’s nostril in the 70s. I felt more sober than W’s morning-after when he woke up in ass-less chaps to find he was the President of the last centu- rys most powerful nation. I thought that maybe I should never think such scary thoughts again. What saved the world from nuclear war in the 60s was the decency and morality of Kennedy, McNamara, ex-US Ambassador to the Soviet Union Tommy Thompson, and even Soviet leader Nikita Krushchey. In the 2000s, we look around the nuclear playground and see the decency and morality of Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfield, versus your pick of known terrorists Osama Bin Laden, Kim Jong Il, Ayatollah Khameini, or Janeane Garofalo. The Fog of War scared the wait. a bejeezus out of me. Not for its honest retelling of atrocities long since glazed over and forgotten, not for its artful presentation on the devastation of war, not even for its tactful pauses whenever McNamara’s lessons from Vietnam’s past deserved Iraq's present consideration. The Fog of War scared the bejeezus out of me because it reminded me that we are _ still in a nuclear crisis. Every day we run the risk of no tomorrow. Robert Strange McNamara—who I still am unsure of as to whether he’s a crazy old coot rationalizing his death bed confessions, or a wise old man ~ imploring us to heed the lessons of his brave admis- sions—said that there is only one hope associated with war. — No honest military officer would ever claim to have never made a mistake, he said. You can only hope to learn from these mistakes _ so that even if you are found in error two or. three times, you will be able to prevent the fourth and fifth from hap- pening. But how can we ever hope to _ learn from a second chance when our generation’s history has been — given no room for error by his generation’s weapons? The Fog of War can be seen, and should be seen, at Tinseltown the- atres. Check your Cheerios box for a $5 off coupon. Robert Strange McNamara