By JJ McCullough Sie time ago, it became a matter of consensus among the American punditocracy that the 2008 US presidential primaries were basically bad news for conservative voters. Republicans were cursed with a crop of exceedingly lacklustre candidates, the pundits declared; a situation that would make a race that the GOP was already supposedly destined to lose even more hopeless and depressing. So maybe something’s wrong with me, because I’m conservative and I like basically all of the 2008 Republican nominees. Indeed, one could argue that this is actually the most dynamic and engaging cast of Republicans to arise in some time; certainly much more than the rather tepid Bush-McCain tournament of 2000, or the even lamer Bob Dole coronation of 1996. My favourite racehorse at present remains former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. A sane man with sensible policies who is also jolly and upbeat in a way only Mormons seem to be able to muster, Romney seems to be the right guy at the right time. He knows what Bush did right, like the War on Terror, and defends it staunchly, but also knows how far the Republican establishment has drifted from their supposedly sacred low-spending, fiscally 8 responsible principles—and pledges to reassert them. The Governor’s supposed token deficiency (the pundits have named exactly one for each candidate, creating some sort of bizarre flaw tabulation) is that he’s too much of a flip-flopper to possessing a level of intellectualism that a reactionary partisan-for-life will never have. If Romeny’s own account is to be believed, the governor grew consciously disillusioned with liberalism as _ his political career developed, becoming more conservative as he realized the earn the trust of inherient flaws the conservative “R t of the left’s base. Exhibit A omney Ss eems O arguments, and the in this regard is a horrible video be the right guy at common-sense of the right’s. He’s a from 1994 that skilled debater for shows Romney e e the very reason declaring how fhe right time.” that he intimately much he hates understands _ the Ronald Reagan rhetoric and tactics and loves abortions. At the time, he was running to unset Ted Kennedy as Massachusetts senator, and evidently it was the opinion of Romney’s handlers that the best way for a Republican to do this was to attempt to out-liberal the Senate’s most liberal member. Bizarrely, this strategy failed. Romney now claims _ to be staunchly pro-life and Reagan’s ideological heir, in what many critics call a very strategically convenient about-face. There is a case to be made for the merits of such an apparent flopper, however. A man who has been a true believer in the other side, and then abandoned them is ultimately a man of the left, and can now outsmart the opposition on their own terms. But this back-story is somewhat irrelevant in the larger scheme. Whatever his history, Romney is reliably conservative today, but is a_ useful candidate for primarily other reasons. As a successful New England politician, nominating Romney as the GOP flag- bearer would help tone down perceptions (which are increasingly justifiable) that the Republican Party has all but resigned itself to merely being a Southern- bloc party of the former Confederacy. Conservatism is a viable ideology even in so-called “blue states,’ however, and at any given moment a great many Plenty of Good Picks in the Republican Crop more people are Republicans than can be bothered to realize it. The problem with American conservatism is that the message has gotten lost in the medium. When people think “Republican” they now increasingly think of the personalities who comprise the loudest faces of the party, the stereotypically self-righteous, boorish Evangelicals with irritating drawls and bad hair, rather than the ideological principles of small government and personal responsibility. A non-accented Northern leader who doesn’t see the Republican Party as a mere appendage of his local Baptist congregation is what the GOP really needs to give the American conservative movement appeal to a broader base and new generation. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani is attractive for largely the same reasons as Romney, and has faced largely the same criticisms. As another Republican who is running to the right after spending a great deal of time governing to the left, Giuliani has done a lot less to distance himself from his former views, retaining pro-choice and pro-gay views that are generally anaemic to his part’s base. Yet he’s a national celebrity and people love him for largely non-ideological reasons, Continued on Page 21