Teaching Excellence TOWARD THE BEST IN THE ACADEMY Distributed courtesy of: CENTRE FOR CURRICULUM AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Fifth Floor, 1483 Douglas Street Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3K4 Fall 1989 If Learning Involves Risk-taking, Teaching Involves Trust-building The premise of this article is that learning, like all other creative acts, will flourish in an atmosphere in which the learner is willing to take risks, and itis the task of the instruc- tor to create such an atmosphere for learning. If we accept this view of learn- ing as risk-taking, we can begin to confront the factors that discourage students from taking risks and build a class environment where learning becomes less of a risk, or where the risk-taking in learning becomes val- ued instead of dreaded. Both of these directions require that instruc- tors develop a trusting relationship with students. When students trust an instruc- tor, they will believe in the instruc- tor’s ability to turnany situation into a learning opportunity; they will expect the instructor to value their efforts; they will be willing to take the chances that lead to learning and to view failuresas learning opportu- nities. What, then, might be the char- acteristics of an instructor who would support student risk-taking? These four stand out: Model how to take risks: One way to build student confidence is to be willing to take risks yourself. A great deal of emotion and social behavior is learned through model- ing (Bandura, 1977). By the way you handle errors and wrong turns, you demonstrate to students that even experts make mistakes. Forexample, being willing to consider non-stan- dard questions and situations or being alert to and bringing in new developments in the field for which there are no “correct” answers both indicate to the students that you also are in the process of learning. Exude organization and compe- tence: Personally, | never worry about flying unless the pilot starts sounding nervous. The same seems true in classroom learning. When the students are convinced that the instructor is “in control” and knows where the class is going, they will feel more comfortable about taking risks. They will be confident that if they make a mistake or go off on a wrong tangent, the instructor will be able to bring them back on target. Therefore, the instructor must be well-organized and _ solidly grounded in the content such that he or she can handle any eventuality. Minimize the pain of making an error: Onereason many students are reluctant to take risks is the fact that our classrooms have such a strong evaluation component. They are afraid that if they make an error in class, it will affect their grade. There- fore, it would be useful to separate the learning from the evaluating. Doeseverything assigned have to be graded? If in-class activities are known to be “preparations” for the evaluation, but not themselves graded, students are just as mot- vated to use that opportunity to prepare. Evidence from the mastery learning literature has demonstrated the value of letting students check their learning prior to the “real” test (Bloom, 1984). Another way to separate grad- ing from learning is to allow stu- dents to work together on new ideas. That way their initial errors will be tempered by the responses of their colleagues before being seen by the instructor. There is a lot of work being done these days on the bene- fits of collaborative learning, much of it demonstrating the positive feel- ings that result when students work together (Johnson and Johnson, 1985). And when you do manage to separate the learning from theevalu- ation in the minds of the students, youshould work onseparating them in your own mind. How you react to student errors will be an important determinant of how they perceive their own errors. If you look upon them as learning opportunities and encourage the students to explore their own thinking, you will be build- ing trust and encouraging risk-tak- ing (Adams, 1986). Provide risk-taking opportunities: In order to help students take risks, the instructor must provide oppor- (Continued on back) 9